Back to episode — Episode 2623 CWSA 10/09/24
Context —
ecause it'd be one thing to see the replicator do that printing one item at a time. You wait forever. But imagine if they could just shoot some sound waves at something and you just see a form forming as a solid. That would be completely different. Anyway, that's on the way. So the... is she the president? I guess that would be the title of Italy's Giorgia Meloni. She's in court because she's try…
← Previous segment →t for personal use. Suppose you took a real-life person, took a photo, even added their voice if there's some audio of them. If you create a whole digital sex slave that's based very closely on a real person, does the real person have any claim against you, or should they?
This is such new territory that it's hard to imagine even how you'd respond to it. But here's the part that you can know for sure, 100% sure. People will be taking pictures of real people and turning them into digital sex slaves and companions. Why wouldn't they? If you had the technology and it was just an app and all you had to do is feed it a picture or a video, why wouldn't you? I don't even know the argument for not doing it. Of course you would. If you were lonely and you wanted something to keep you company, you might as well make it something you like a little extra. Why wouldn't you?
Well anyway, CNN is reporting that it's not true that the Afghan refugees that have been coming into the country since the Afghan war wound down with the United States, it's not true that the Afghan refugees have not been adequately vetted. So all you people are saying, oh, they're letting in a bunch of Afghans and some of them might be terrorists. CNN is here to tell you in a big headline it is not true, not true, that the Afghans have not been effectively vetted. Also CNN would like you to know that an Afghan national refugee has been charged with planning a mass murder on Election Day. So I suppose you can pick either one of those headlines. One of them is true. Either they were carefully vetted or there's an Afghan refugee who just got caught plotting a mass murder on Election Day. One of those is definitely true. So 50/50. Not bad.
The question I have is how many disasters will we have around Election Day? Probably hurricanes. We got the monkeypox. The ISIS terrorist attack that was thwarted. But maybe there's some more. Maybe something with drones. Maybe World War III. Maybe something nuclear. Earthquake. Rods from God. Space lasers. UFO contact. I don't think we have any idea how wild things are going to get. But I'll tell you one thing. No matter what happens on its own, like just naturally, it was a coincidence, we're going to blame on somebody. If there's an earthquake, you know we're going to be talking about the CIA's technology for triggering earthquakes. You know we are, right? So if there's a solar flare, somebody's going to say that there's CIA technology that can create a solar flare, and that's not... it's no accident that happened on Election Day if it does.
Meanwhile, TikTok's getting more lawsuits. I guess 14 states, and it's bipartisan. So this is not just Democrats and not just Republicans. It's both getting together because I think TikTok's dangerous for young people. Why is TikTok even available for young people, minors? Yeah, I feel like there's almost universal agreement that it's bad for young people below, y
Context —
ou know, maybe you could pick 16 as your starting age. But is there anybody who disagrees with that? Now I guess there's a free speech element to it, but does that apply to children? Do children have free speech? I'm pretty sure they can't stand up in class and start cursing. You know, there are limits on what kids can do. So it's weird that this is even a question. But I have a feeling that whoe…
Next segment → →