Back to episode — Episode 2641 CWSA 10/27/24
Context —
hey're actually bad for the country. So you know, I'm not sure they were ever good for the country, but at the moment it's super, super obvious that the mainstream news is fake news. It's propaganda. It's bad for the country. So why do they get free assets to be bad for the country? Because I think that's not even controversial at this point. Even people are mad at their own preferred sources. You…
← Previous segment →ant conservatives to even have a message. But then when they invite them on, they talk over them. I mean just grossly talk over them so they can't say a thing.
Now you could argue that same thing happens if a liberal goes on a conservative show. There might be the same thing. But my larger point is that the traditional media is a talk-over media. Here's my summary: traditional media is about talking over somebody until you run out of time. Nobody cares about that. I don't want to see anybody talk over somebody until you're out of time. Like why? What good is that? So yeah, traditional media is completely broken at this point.
Nicole Shanahan's video geniuses have another good one called The Big Cheat. So it's a campaign ad again. It's really, really well done. Whoever is making her videos is highly talented. But it's called The Big Cheat, and you think it's going to be about, you know, 2020 cheat, but it's not. It's about how Bernie Sanders was cheated out of his place at the party. It was about how the 51 intel chiefs were cheating at the end of the election. About how Biden was dethroned and it was about how Kamala was installed. And once you see how the Democrats treat other Democrats, it's really hard to imagine that the election itself is not rigged. Because everything that the Democrats are doing to themselves is rigging. I mean they're rigging each other. So to imagine that they would rig each other right in front of the whole world but not rig the election to actually win it is kind of a stretch. It'd be kind of hard to believe really that they're not going to do anything sketchy.
So there's more news on the Washington Post not endorsing anybody, which is a rare thing. They normally endorse the Democrat. And there's some reporting that maybe Jeff Bezos reached some kind of a deal with Trump. I'm not sure I'm ready to believe that. I would believe that if I heard it from Bezos or from Trump, but I would believe it from literally nobody else. I don't want to hear about somebody was in the room, somebody overheard a conversation, some anonymous source. So I don't trust anything about that story. But it seems to me that you don't need a conversation between Trump and Bezos for this to happen. Here's why.
Number one, has Bezos been active in politics so far? Not really, right? I can't think of Bezos doing anything overly political. His wife, however, which I'm sure he's just really happy with, did take many billions of his dollars and put them heavily into left-leaning things that he may not completely agree with. So you have to wonder. And somebody speculated this on X. You wonder if this is marriage related. As in, the one way you could really, really bug your ex-wife who just spent billions of your dollars on things you didn't want to be spent on could be. It was just a big F you to his wife. Now he'd have plenty of cover for why he'd have other reasons to do it, which is you should just stay out of politics. He doesn't want to get Bud Lighted. He doesn't want to get Targeted. He doesn't want to get Disneyed. Yes, he has an absolute responsibility that if you're a conservative author you still want to use Amazon. If you're a liberal author you still want to use Amazon. If there were one person that really, really, really wanted to not be involved in politics, it's Jeff Bezos. Because he's like the person who can control what algorithm shows you what books. I mean that's way too much power to come down hard on one side of politics. So Bezos being a genius, simply doing what smart people do and stay out of it.
Now if you look at Elon Musk and you say, but how can they both be smart geniuses when they're doing opposite things? I think if you look at what Elon's doing, he's far more, let's say, far more willing to take a risk. And I think he thinks there's more at stake probably. So I don't mind either opinion. They come, you know, it looks like they're coming to their decisions in different ways, but they're both smart and I would respect both those. I think I respect Bezos staying out of politics as much as I appreciate Musk getting into politics, because they don't seem to be doing it in a dumb way. They seem to be doing it for what seems to be perfectly good reasons.
Anyway, can you believe that CNN doesn't know the drink bleach hoax is a hoax? And they sold both the host and the guest argued with Scott Jennings that Trump did in fact say drink bleach. How could you have a job in news and think that happened in the real world? You know, we finally beat the fine people hoax. That's now common knowledge that that was a hoax. But the drinking bleach one? Oh my God. How anyone believes that Trump suggested drinking bleach or even injecting any kind of liquid disinfectant. If there's anybody new to the feed, the real story is he was talking about light as an antiseptic. He started by talking about light, then he ta
Context —
lked about it, and then he bookended it by talking about light. But the other experts didn't know he was talking about light or missed that point, and they talked about other things. He never talked about anything but light. And so light was actually being tried as a disinfectant in your trachea and a disinfectant potentially in your lungs if they could stick a light source into your lungs and irr…
Next segment → →