Back to episode — Episode 2664 CWSA 11/19/24
Context —
control the election. Now do you remember was it Dr. Robert Epstein I think who said that Google could change an election by quite a few points? What would happen if Google had not been influencing the election and mainstream media had not been trying to influence the election and the fake polls had not been trying to influence the election? How much would it, how much could Trump have won by if…
← Previous segment →a few bad actors that you honestly thought the world was a different place than what it is and then you acted accordingly. Now I think that Democrats in the information bubble that they were in were acting for the greatest good. That's what it looks like to me. It looks like their intentions were entirely based on the greater good and if you listen to them talk that's the way they talked. You know this is good for this group it's good for that group. Now of course it wasn't for the greater good. It was destroying America but they didn't know. They thought things were going swimmingly because the news that they watched said this Joe Biden thing's got everything under control. His brain is working perfectly and if anything ever went wrong God we're lucky we've got Kamala Harris the highly qualified vice president to take over immediately if ever needed. None of that was ever true. Not I don't think anything probably almost nothing that was an official claim of the news or the media was true. Almost nothing.
Now there's fake news on both sides obviously. It's not limited to one side but the extent of it I think was unparalleled. I think the Democrats broke some new kind of record for fooling themselves.
What else we got here? So now Axios and you're seeing a little grumbling from Democrats saying that if there are millions of deported undocumented immigrants if Trump goes ahead with it it will create gigantic negative effects in the economy meaning that the people who need to pick the crops and do the work they're not going to have enough workers and it will be a 6.8 percent drop in the national GDP. All right do you believe that?
Here's what I think. I never have any respect for the critics who start with okay assume you do everything the stupid way. And then I want to say wait wait wait stop talking. No no we need to discuss what's going to happen. Okay but your assumption was that I was going to do a thing that could easily be done the smart way but you're saying let's start with the assumption that you do it the stupidest possible way. Yeah yeah yeah let's do that. So let's talk about tariffs and we're going to put one hundred percent tariffs on everything. Wait wait wait no. Tariffs are a negotiating tool so I'm not going to accept your assumption that we use them in the stupidest possible way which is put it on everything without thinking about it. We might do it strategically. We might try to protect an industry. We might say we're going to do comp
Context —
rehensive tariffs just as a negotiating tool but don't assume that we're going to do a smart thing that could easily be done the smart way and people have done it the smart way forever. That Trump will be the only one who will do it the dumb way. So here's how you do immigration the dumb way. The dumb way would be on day one go get all the farm workers. I mean seriously do you think that the bord…
Next segment → →