that's not going to happen but you could be afraid of it. And they may be a little less. Here's a generalization I think this is a fair generalization. They're probably more men who pay attention to military stuff and can maybe interpret what's happening a little bit better because we just pay attention to it. It's sort of a male thing.

So in the same way that I told you that the safest you've ever been from nuclear war is right now that that's a male perspective because I really look at these things all the time and it doesn't make me a genius but I pay attention. Whoever pays attention the most to any domain is going to have a little advantage. I pay attention to the military domain so when I say that this is the safest you've ever been I believe a lot of men probably say something like oh I get it. Well let me check how many men heard me say that this is literally the safest we could ever be because you just have to wait a few weeks and it goes away and everybody knows that. How many of you said oh that's a good point? And did anybody agree with that by the way? It'd be good if some of you agreed with it. But if you did not follow politics and you did not follow military stuff and the only thing you heard was that there was a talking head on MSNBC who says that something happened that moved us closer to nuclear war because I'm seeing social media people saying it's now 11:59 you know the last minute of human race because of this. If that's all you heard it you'd be scared to death. If somebody just told you yeah we're attacking Russia and they threatened with nuclear war and that's all you knew how afraid would you be? Quite afraid.

So my hypothesis is that men are harder to scare. We're just harder to scare. But on top of that we also don't get abortions and we're not the ones having the babies so there's just some things we're not worried about. So I think that it makes sense that since what we think is true about politics is usually a bunch of lies when men hear the lies they're supposed to scare them it doesn't scare them as much so they can stay on course. When women hear we're going to take your bodily autonomy and there's going to be a nuclear war if they're not really paying attention to the news that's the scariest you've ever heard in your life. I mean that's some really really scary. So they're going to vote against it. It makes perfect sense.

So I will add to the Naval take which I think is valid that women are looking to the state for things that men used to provide you know the husband used to provide. That's valid. And I think that feminism and birth control certainly are changing the way thoughts are being formed so that's in the mix somewhere. But I just think generally speaking men are less easy to scare. I think that's the big difference.

All right I hate to even bring this up but I guess I have to. So according to the Vigilant Fox there's a bombshell autopsy study. Now before I tell you what it says let me give you my opinion that there's no data that comes down about the pandemic or the COVID that's credible. Some of it will be true some of it will not but I won't know which is credible and which isn't or which is true and which isn't. So therefore it's not credible. Credible is different from true. So I'm going to tell you what the story is but I'm also going to tell you personally might be true might not be so I'm not sold but I could be. I could be later sold but I'm not sold yet.

But the report is that autopsies show that COVID vaccines are the larger cause of death than even the virus itself. It's a study that's been twice peer-reviewed so that means a lot right? It's a study that was twice peer-reviewed. Okay let me explain. Peer review does give you no confidence whatsoever. It does mean it's not so obviously stupid that it shouldn't be in the conversation. It doesn't mean it's real. Peer review just looks at surfacey kind of things. So if on the surface there was nothing amazingly bad about it they say well it's peer-reviewed. You'd have to duplicate it and make sure you knew your data was good before you could have confidence.

But here is the claim. Seventy-four percent of the deaths were linked to the vaccination instead of the COVID. Do I believe that? No no I don't. Is it possible that is true? Yes yes it is. So this is the credibility thing. I just don't believe any of the pandemic data or conclusions any of it. It's just so filled with misinformation I wouldn't know what's real and what's not and peer review doesn't help me at all. I'm sorry peer review gives me no confidence at all.

Of the COVID vaccine related deaths sudden cardiac arrest died suddenly was the leading cause of deaths thirty-five percent of cases. Do I believe that? No. But it's also possible. I just don't believe it on the surface. COVID vaccine related deaths occurred rapidly averaging within two weeks basically and the majority happened within a week. Now that I believe. That sounds well I would say that's within the realm of possible because my understanding is when the vaccination first came out the experts said if you're looking for how dangerous it is look for what happens in the first few weeks because overwhelmingly it's predictable that if it's going to kill people it's going to be kind of fast. You know you don't look at you know there might still be longer term problems but most of the risk is that first two week period. So that's why although I did get the first two vaccinations that's why I waited. So I waited six months I think six months after I was eligible and the reason I waited was first two weeks I want to see who dies. I'm not going to be first in line. Month goes by I'm not sure I trust the data. Two months three months six months and it wasn't until I just really wanted to travel internationally that I decided it was time to take the risk. But it makes sense that if there were injuries they would happen in the first two weeks more often than after.

All right but there's other research. Again I have no idea how believable this is but there's some study by let's see independent investigator John B. Seigenthaler highlighting findings by Kevin McKernan a researcher from blah blah blah and they say the vaccines are causing turbo cancer basically and the turbo cancers would grow more aggressively than typical ones and they would affect your lymph nodes and bone cancer specifically mentioned lymph nodes and bone cancer. What do you think of that on