Back to episode — Episode 2682 CWSA 12/07/24
Context —
e judge said well if you can't agree on this we'll basically dismiss it. Now go back think about the lower charge. I guess that'll happen on Monday. So here's what the people who know way more than I do about the law and the courts are telling me. So I'm listening to people like Mike Cernovich and people have legal backgrounds and Jonathan Turley is writing about it. So let me just tell you what…
← Previous segment →ld be a really handsome young guy. So now you've got this you know apparently a very smart killer who's got his own clever nickname the healthcare hitman and the one picture of him that they're trying to sell us on which I don't believe by the way he's really good looking like really good looking like movie star good looking. I don't know there there's something terribly wrong about how movie perfect this is and that we're treating it as entertainment and I am too so I'm as guilty as the people I'm talking about. So the effect that I'm seeing in other people which is what I'm describing I feel it too. I feel like my own sense of empathy has been hijacked into some kind of recreational mode. So I apologize for that. But there are a lot of interesting things about the story.
For example the fact that he got out of New York. So apparently he left on foot, got a bike, took a bike into the park. They say he left a backpack there. His backpack. We'll talk about that. I don't believe that either. And took a little known bus station that's lesser used so fewer witnesses and got out of the state. They think they also think that he used a veterinarian gun. Now this is not everybody but there's some thought that he used a veterinarian gun which is apparently I never knew there was one but because there might be other animals in the neighborhood when you're putting down an animal such as let's say cattle or something you don't want to scare the other animals so you have this thing that works at very close range literally you're supposed to put it up to the skull of the animal you're going to put down. So it's not even meant to shoot 20 feet. I don't believe it's meant for one shot in the head close up. I think that's all it's for. Now that's only if it's truly a veterinarian gun which I never even heard of before.
So here are the things that I think I know for sure. His quick use of the gun whether he was putting in a new shell or clearing it there's a little disagreement on that. He certainly knew what he was doing so he seemed to understand the weapon well enough to know that he had to do a thing after every shot whatever the thing was and then he did it. But if he were a professional he would have used the veterinarian gun the way the veterinarians use it which is he would have run up because the guy was just walking. He was only what 10 or 15 feet in front of him. All he had to do is take a few running steps, bang, and then drop the gun if there was no DNA on it. But he didn't.
So here's the thing. You've all seen now probably the face where they claim it's another picture of the shooter but this time he pulled his mask down to flirt with somebody at a hostel and you can clearly see his face. Now I'm going to tell you something that I haven't seen in the news yet but have any of you ever experienced the facial recognition apps that are currently available now? I don't know if they're available to the public. Maybe they're only available to law enforcement at this point. But I'm going to tell you something that maybe you didn't know about them. They would identify this guy 100 percent of the time. There is plenty of his face showing. A facial recognition app would pick him up 100 percent of the time. There's no way he's not on social media which is how the facial recognition finds you. There's no way he's not on social media. He has a very distinctive face and you can see the whole face. There is no chance that if that's a real picture of the shooter that law enforcement doesn't already know who he is. It would be about five seconds. In fact if you have the facial recognition app you could probably recognize. I bet you could get an ID just from the photo that's on social media. Does anybody have access to one? If you have one of the facial recognition that just put it on the phone it'll tell you who that guy is. So I don't think there's any chance that if you show that picture to the whole world that he's not been identified by now. Do you think that's real? Do you think there's any chance that that picture is clearly as you can see his face and he's so distinctive and it's been on every TV show everywhere and you think that a guy who looks like that and at that age doesn't have families and friends and people who would recognize him immediately? Everything about this story is off.
First of all the story where you see his face clearly it's obviously not the shooter. He's wearing different clothes, has different backpack. It's obviously not him because if it were him we would already have him. We'd know who he is because his face is completely recognizable. If the public hadn't done it the facial recognition software would do it literally in a second. In one second you just go. In fact you if you have it on your phone just call up the picture and just put your phone next to it. If you've got one of those apps click on it and in one second it'll tell you who it is if he's a real person. Now some have said it might be like a Hollywood mask or something maybe but that was a pretty big smile for a mask. I don't know it's hard to pull off that smile. I think if you had a mask you would maybe try to prevent smiling because that would be one place you could spot there was something wrong. Yeah he doesn't have the same jacket and then the police say they found the backpack in the park and then the backpack doesn't even look like the backpack he was wearing say some people. So none of the colors are right. The person isn't right. It's all wrong. It's all wrong.
Now I'm going to tell you a story from my real life that matches this story. You won't believe that there's any story that matches this story but there is. My first job in corporate America was a bank teller and I got robbed twice at gunpoint during my job as a teller. One of those times the guy who robbed me was this older man. I thought he was maybe late 60s, kind of disheveled, gray hair losing most of it, kind of smallish about my size. And so when the FBI came they said all right can you describe the guy who robbed you. I described him that way. This old guy with a little bit of gray hair blah blah blah. And then they came back and they said are you sure you pulled the alarm on time because there's a secret way that tellers pull the alarm so the cameras will capture the crime. And I said yeah I'm positive. Like as soon as he asked for the money I did the thing where you activate the camera. And they said because there's nobody on the film that looks anything like what you described. So they said we're going to take you down to the secret FBI headquarters and we're going to show you the video and you tell me that's the guy who robbed you. I'm like sure easy because the guy he was very distinctive and he had a long long coat on. I mean I had perfect memory of him. And my boss soon as the robber left I alerted my boss and my boss followed him down the street like from a distance but just to get a ID. And when my boss was asked to describe him he described him the same way I did. Older guy gray hair got a small long jacket. So we had the same description.
And then the FBI shows me the video of the moment and they say all right is this guy standing in front of the teller window is that the one that robbed you. I was like no that's not even close. So they showed me this video of a guy who looked like a young Clint Eastwood with a big mustache you know solid dark hair probably mid-30s yeah and had a sport coat on didn't have a long jacket like the guy I saw. And I said no obviously not. So they said watch this. And then manually they could rewind the video and I watched that guy rob me on video. So a guy who looked like Clint Eastwood on video was the actual guy who robbed me. The guy I saw very clearly and described within seconds I mean minutes I guess of the actual robbery and my boss independently who did not talk to me before that we described him as a completely different person. Explain that. And it's even weirder. Once I saw the person on video that looked like that young Clint Eastwood I said first of all I've never seen that guy in person but I've definitely seen him a lot because he's got a picture right on the wall where I worked saying that he was a bank robber who was you know he was a known bank robber. He was literally on the wall as a known bank robber and he looked just like the video. I recognized him immediately when I saw the video but I didn't recognize him in person. You look like an old man. So you tell me what happened. It's been one of the great mysteries of my life.
Now I got robbed twice. The other one I picked out of a lineup easily as did all the other people. Easy. He looked exactly like I described him. Picked them out of a lineup no problem. But sometimes people don't look like they look on video. That's all I can tell you. All I can tell you is that sometimes the video doesn't match what you thought you saw in person. So I don't know.
CNN said that the bullet casings did have some inscription in them something engraved that would suggest it was a healthcare related problem meaning that he somebody maybe got denied some coverage because it had that deny delay title of the book on it. Now I had predicted that in the fog of crime you would ultimately find out that there is not the inscription on the bullets. I'm going to stick with that. I'm going to stick with it even though CNN just confirmed that there is something on the bullets and they even gave details and I'm still going to stick with there's nothing on the bullets. Now you might say to me but Scott that's a very bad bet because everybody's reporting there's something on the bullets. I'm not there yet. I'm not there. I'm going to need to see a picture of those bullets. I'm going to need to see a picture because I think there's a problem that maybe people are hearing it from other news sources and you know maybe it's just one fake story that got amplified. I'm going to wait but maybe I'm not going to rule out that it's on there but not quite buying it yet. Everything about this story looks hinky anyway so we'll wait on that.
As one of the January Sixers said and I'm paraphrasing I stood outside the Capitol on January 6 and had no criminal record did not post anything on social media and the FBI found me in two weeks. Okay now hold that in your head. They found that guy in two weeks. Now there were other videos there so of course they could pick them up. You think that they don't know who this guy is? I'm having real trouble believing that they don't know who at least the one with his face showing is. So there's something very deeply wrong about this.
Meanwhile over in El Salvador I don't know how this is real either. So the president Bukele he just says El Salvador has discovered they have a three trillion dollar unmined gold field and now he's moving to decriminalize some of the mining laws or get rid of some regulations I guess so that they can mine it. Three trillion dollars of unmined gold. They also found according to the president gallium, thallium, tin and other materials needed for you know the future. So this young guy this young good looking guy comes in becomes the president of El Salvador brings in didn't he bring in Bitcoin as their legal currency which turned out to be a genius move apparently and then he solves all of crime in the country by locking up just basically everybody who even looked a little criminal and now he just by luck he happens to be in charge when they find three trillion dollars of extra money that would turn El Salvador from you know a wannabe I don't know what would you say it a not a third world country but it would basically put him right at the top tier of economic powers in the world. And this just happened by coincidence the same time the guy who did all the other good stuff is in power. This is weird. Like it just seems too simulation or too many coincidences. I don't know.
Meanwhile over in Syria Iranian assets are pulling out. So the Iranians of course were supporting Assad as were the Russians but the rebels are making such progress and Assad's forces are not putting up much resistance so the reporting is that the Iranian assets the generals and the advisers and whatever are just running because they know they can't do it themselves and they're not getting help from the military so they're just abandoning. So it looks like Assad is going to maybe retreat his forces to the most important defensible part which is the part that's the Russian port. So the area around the Russian port because if they don't protect that then Russia doesn't have any reason to protect them. So what if Russia doesn't protect them and what if they lose that port and the rebels take over that changes a lot of things doesn't it? And again I'll say that I think that what's happening in Syria has to be seen as part of all the variables for war from you know Hezbollah to Hamas to Ukraine. I think it's all related because it's all the same players. So this gives them lots of variables to say all right if you give us a little relief on Syria I could do a little more on Gaza but if you pull back on this we could maybe let Iran do a little more trade. So I think it's going to be something where all those variables are in play. We might not know it. In other words there could be some secret components of the negotiation that are not public because you know maybe Iran can do things secretly that they don't want to tell their public they're doing you know something like that. So I feel like the Syria situation makes the odds of a larger deal you know with Russia and Ukraine and United States and Iran more possible not less. So it feels to me like a positive situation that it's moving in a direction that's let's say destabilizing for Iran and for Russia and also showing their weaknesses to the world because neither Iran nor Russia can seemingly protect Assad at the moment from rebels. It's not even the strongest military anyway.
The other biggest story is that all over social media there are all these videos of drones or possibly UAPs or UFOs or secret technology and I had been ignoring it largely up until now because I thought oh it's just
Context —
somebody's balloon or it's just somebody's drone they're flying around. But today I wake up and there's like videos from the East Coast, videos from the West Coast, videos from Argentina I think a few other places in which there were these glowing orbs doing things in sequence. In one case they seem to be going into the ocean. And remember my main theme for today is that all of the news is either…
Next segment → →