Back to episode — Episode 2688 CWSA 12/13/24
Context —
da and brainwash you. I don't get any sense of trying to get it right. But when I watch a podcast, depending on which podcast it is, I often think, "Oh, there's someone who's humble about how much they know and how much they don't know but is trying to get it right." We'll use Joe Rogan as the universal reference. Everybody knows Joe Rogan. Very clearly, you know I can't read minds, but the impres…
← Previous segment →ion to Trump's inaugural fund. But it was $1 million. Now $1 million is a lot of money. That's a lot of money. But $100 million is a completely different story. And the MSNBC host just let that go. So if you were watching MSNBC you'd think that Facebook donated $100 million to just one ceremony for one day. I don't think I've been watching Zuckerberg for many years. He's not that dumb. Turns out he's actually quite brilliant and a really good leader. A million dollars is a smart investment in friends. $100 million would be just bad crazy. So I can't believe that the guest didn't catch himself on that. So I think Media Lies—this was on the X account Media Lies. They picked it up. You should follow them. Media Lies. It used to be "Commie Harris Lies" but now it's more generic.
So Biden did a bunch of pardons as you already know about. He pardoned 39 people yesterday, today, including some say Chinese spies. Do you think it's true that Biden pardoned Chinese spies? How many people think that's real? It's on the internet. It's on social media. Do you think he really pardoned Chinese spies? It's a hard one because when you're talking about pardons anything's possible. But no, he did not pardon any Chinese spies. It is true that the United States had, before yesterday, they had negotiated a prisoner swap. So I guess we had some of their spies and they had some of our spies. And so that deal was already done. But that wasn't a pardon. It is true that the Chinese spies will get out of jail but as part of a prisoner swap, which is fine.
All right. Let's see what else is happening. Let's check in on identity politics. As I've told you, DEI kills everything it touches. So Biden does all these pardons and the news today is talking about how black women are really mad because he didn't do enough for black women. So Representative Pressley, Democrat in Massachusetts, thinks he should have done more to reduce the racial disparities. And he had, I guess he made a campaign promise to reduce the number of incarcerated Americans but he didn't reduce it. And it seems to me this is yet another example of how the Democrat Party doesn't really have a chance of recovering at the national level. Locally they're still fine. But at the national level this is going to happen every time they do anything. Because every demographic group is going to say, "Hey, what did your recent change do to help my group?" Well, you know, we're not always about helping every single group every time. "Yes but wasn't that money you could have spent on my group?" "Well yeah, I mean we do spend money on your group too but right now we're spending some money on this other group." But that could have gone to me. As soon as you have all this identity there isn't any possibility of unity. So the Democrat Party should continue to experience disunity until they can't do anything. And I think the Kamala Harris debacle—if I can call it that—if you count Biden staying in too long, dropping out too late, not really having time for a primary, I think every bit of that was just DEI. And if you think that was like
Context —
a weird year and something happened that one time but you're not going to see that again, no. I think it's the opposite. I think that the Democrat Party is completely destroyed and there is no way to bring it back at the national level. Because if they get rid of identity politics they're done. If they keep identity politics they can continue but not as a competitive entity. So if they want to be…
Next segment → →