I immediately went over to Google and I said to myself, have I been in a coma? Because I followed the news on fusion and I didn't think we were that close. I thought we'd done some demos that show that, you know, for a brief time it can create more energy than it uses, but I didn't think we were anywhere near a practical application where you could just approve it and build it. So given that if you do a Google search it makes no indication that fusion is near ready, do you think they would announce something and Google doesn't even know the technology is there? I'm going to say this is fake news. So I'm going to go out on a limb and say I think maybe they either wrote down fusion when they meant fission or something. Yeah, fusion has happened experimentally. That's what I know. All right, so I think that's fake news.

But if it's not, I saw one post in the comments from Idea Man who said superconductors have been improving a lot and that fusion depends on superconductors. It seems like one of the key components and MIT has been d