Back to episode — Episode 2732 CWSA 01/27/25
Context —
t this time for already a year because he's done so much? Like time doesn't make sense anymore. But here's another one. Doesn't it sound like this didn't come from this era when you hear that somebody wants to dismantle white supremacy? Which two months ago was sort of normal, but now it just feels like, what? What are you, from the past? Am I the only one having that feeling that somehow just eve…
← Previous segment →one of the things Marc Andreessen said, he was dumping on Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock. And he said that Larry Fink fell for every idea in the world. Those are his words. Of course I'm much too nice to use that, but I'm quoting because apparently it's semi-approved at the moment. So he was saying that the DEI and the ESG and the zero point whatever. So yeah, I love to see a hugely important business figure just take a big old run at BlackRock and Larry Fink's head. Just call him out as being basically an idiot who has not been helping and has probably been greatly hurting and doing it on the backs of the shareholders, both in his company and otherwise. So that's good.
As you know, Tulsi Gabbard is up for the DNI job, head of DNI. She has to be confirmed. And over on MSNBC we're watching as John Brennan is saying what a bad pick she would be for the DNI. Now as other people noted, and I often tell you, if you know the story you don't know anything. If you know the players, well, you might know a lot. And this is one of those. If all you knew is that somebody who used to head the CIA said that Tulsi Gabbard was not the right one for the job, you'd say, oh well, that's a very qualified person and a serious qualified person at that. So if somebody serious and qualified says she's not good for the job, you're like, huh, well I should take that pretty seriously.
However, if you know the players it looks pretty different, doesn't it? And most of you who are listening know the players by now. John Brennan, he's the guy who pushed the Russia collusion and the Hunter laptop letter. He is the signal of what you should do the opposite of. And the fact that he appears on MSNBC to spew his stuff, as somebody on X who goes by the name gofun gofun gon says, quote, "I love MSNBC. They give us insight into what the intelligence agencies want us to believe." Well, not the agencies in general, but certainly some elements of them and the worst ones I think.
So yes, that's exactly what I do when I watch MSNBC. I watch it for the humor because it's so stupid. Literally I watch it for the humor. And the other thing is that it does signal to you what the dark intelligence people want you to believe that isn't true. So it's really useful. Again, if you didn't know the players you would just turn it on and think it was news and then you'd say, oh, there's some news. But if you know that they seem to be, and I don't know the details, but it seems to be... all right, I might have to turn off the comments here, but we'll see how it goes. I'll tell you what, I'll just cover the comments with the Locals people. That way I don't have to look at them all. So I can still see the comments but just Locals. Those of you who are being bad in the comments, don't be bad anymore.
Big question for me is when do all the NGOs get defunded? Is that going to happen this week? Now the NGOs are the non-government organizations, which I thought was sort of a limited sort of thing, not that big. But you know, they had something to do with, I don't know, some secret plan for censoring America. And they seem to be deeply involved in assisting illegal im
Context —
migration. And lots of people say some of them are involved in child trafficking, sex trafficking. And the only thing I know for sure is why are there so many of them and why do they cost so much and why are we funding them? It couldn't possibly be a good idea. So I'm pretty sure that nearly all of these need to be shut down immediately because they seem to be working against the interests of Amer…
Next segment → →