high. The dollar amounts would be gigantic and it would be world transforming if we could just make batteries let's say 20 times better. You know pick a number. It would change everything. And sure enough every day there's a new breakthrough. I don't think any one of these are necessarily going to be the one but now there's according to Interesting Engineering there's a new aluminum battery that contains over 99% of its capacity after 10,000 cycles. Now that doesn't mean that that's going into production anytime soon but that's the scale of improvements that people are looking at in batteries. I think you could make the same prediction with batteries that I made with AI. So much money involved, so much at stake that somebody's going to engineer some kind of battery that you just get blown away by. Something you didn't even think was possible I think is coming.

According to the Amuse account on X the Trump administration is going to go after trying to figure out where the billions that were sent to Ukraine ended up. So the FBI and the DOJ they launched this big investigation into where it went and I think we're going to find out some terrible things about where all that money went. It definitely didn't all go to useful weapons and stuff. We'll find out.

In other news the new CIA director Ratcliffe is going to have the CIA evaluate if China intentionally started the pandemic according to the Daily Wire. Now did China intentionally start the pandemic? Here's where they could save a lot of time and money in the CIA by simply asking me. Scott, did China intentionally release a virus in their own major city? No. And we're done here.

Now a lot of people have been giving me a hard time about this on X today after I said it on X. And people saying Scott, Scott how do you explain X? How do you explain Y? How do you explain this other thing? To which I say I don't have to. Nobody releases a deadly virus in their own city first if they have a clever plan to take down the rest of the world. A clever plan to take down the rest of the world would be releasing it in Chicago. Now that would be a good plan. Or London. That would be a good plan. Or better yet multiple places at once but all of them ones who don't have a big connection to China directly. Nobody releases a virus, a deadly virus, in their own country to take down other countries. Nobody. Ever. Ever. Ever.

Now the response I got to that is Scott you don't understand that China doesn't value human life. Okay I don't want to go all woke on you but that's just racist. That's not an opinion. That's just racist. Because even if you said they didn't value human life and they do, they do value human life. I'm not going to accept Chinese are the only people who don't value human life. That's ridiculous. I mean that's really ridiculous. But even if they didn't value human life they wouldn't release it in their own city. There is no rational argument for why they do that.

And then somebody else said but they're not rational. Yes they are. They're like one of the most rational places ever. If they weren't rational they would have already made a move on Taiwan. They would have done everything different if they weren't rational. Everything China does you might not like it but you can see the glaring common sense to it from their perspective. So no you do not have to study this. Nobody releases a deadly virus in their own city first when you could release it somewhere else.

Now that we know that the virus came from the lab and therefore was part of a weaponization or at least gain of function which sounds like weaponization this might explain some of the mysteries that I had during the pandemic. I was trying to understand why. But and the problem is that I knew it was from the lab from the first weeks. You know I told you a friend of mine showed me the Google Map long before it was in the news. Nobody in the news had heard of it. He said you know it's right across the street from the Wuhan lab of I don't know what with the perfect name for exactly this. And as soon as I saw that I was like oh obviously they're just saying it came from the wet market but clearly that would be too big of a coincidence that the lab that does this exact work is across the street. So I knew it was weaponized or at least gain of function which would end up looking like the same thing.

And so when people said Scott don't get the shots it's just a cold, if you thought it was just a cold it would be ridiculous to get a shot wouldn't it? If it was just a cold why would you take a chance on a new medicine in the form of a shot? That'd be crazy. But if you knew that it was a gain of function and therefore unpredictable wouldn't it be at least a toss up that if you took some kind of technology that was designed to minimize its impact on you, the shot. Now again you didn't know if it'd work. You don't know what the side effects are. There's a big risk. We all agree that no matter what else it was a risk to take the shot. But it was also a pretty big risk to be completely unprotected and get a weaponized virus especially since you didn't know what the long-term effects were. The long so-called long COVID.

So if you thought it was a slam dunk decision probably you thought it was also a cold and that means you probably didn't know that it came from a weaponized lab. But what I'm seeing is people who knew it came from a gain of function lab meaning either accidentally or intentionally weaponized and you still said it was a cold. You must have really not trus