so." "You're saying it." "Well no, it's the opposite. I'm not." "Oh, so you're saying you would give money. So under these conditions you would throw the Constitution under the bus. Is that right?" "No, nothing like that." "So all right, we've agreed you would throw the Constitution under the bus." And the amount of emotion that was obviously theatrical and fake was kind of impressive. So it made me think he's a terrible politician but I bet he actually would be good in theater. Like legitimately. He looks like he has the chops. So he could be a professional actor anyway. So he's got a future there.

Speaking of grift, here's what David Sacks says about Ukraine. He says with Americans becoming exhausted with forever wars in the Middle East, the quote "democracy promotion grifters" at USAID and NED and the rest of the NGOs needed a new cause. Ukraine was perfect. As the most corrupt country in Europe it would allow them to expropriate billions. Now is that just the Republican narrative? Because it's the one I see and it looks obvious to me. Do you think Democrats understand that Ukraine was part grift and part neocon wanting to destroy Russia? Or do Democrats think that we were protecting this spunky little country because it should be part of NATO? Like what do Democrats really think Ukraine was all about? Do they really not have any access to the narratives that are coming out from the Republicans? It feels like they just think, well let's just give them infinite more money. That should solve everything because Putin's a bad, bad man. I'm not saying Putin's a good man. I'm just saying probably this was a combination of people who looked for enormous grift opportunities and found them and people who wanted to destroy Russia. And it was an opportunistic way to do it. So no, it looks like a giant scam to us.

Meanwhile Mario Nawfal is reporting that Tucker Carlson had a conversation with the prime minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán. Now if you're not following closely, Hungary is one of those countries that is sort of close to a Trump-like view of the world. You know, a conservative not buying into the mass immigration kind of thing. And so what would be the fate of Hungary that just wants to be an independent little country and supportive of the United States? Would be a supportive country, one would be happy to be working with us. Well, because it's not exactly what the Democrats want or the liberal elite, as you might say. So this is what Viktor Orbán says is happening. He goes, "The fact is that the liberal elite of the West used the taxpayer money of the United States citizens to spread their ideology around the world and finance more than 60 NGOs, paid politicians and media outlets in Hungary. It was a plot against our sovereignty and independence." This is exactly how we overthrow other countries. We fund a whole bunch of stuff, non-government organizations, but really it's ways to influence things like the media and politicians. It's a way to get a whole bunch of money and assets and intelligence people into somebody's country. And Viktor Orbán is completely aware of it. He knows the whole plot. He probably can name all 60 NGOs and he probably knows exactly which media outlets are being bought by the United States. It's probably exactly what it looks like, that the United States is actively trying to overthrow not an enemy. This is the scary part. Hungary is not an enemy. So why are we trying to overthrow their government? They're