Back to episode — Episode 2791 CWSA 03/27/25
Context —
hinese or the Russians or the Iranians would have lost their access. I think that if they had access to that tool and they were listening to our government conversations at the highest level, I'm pretty sure they would have said, well, we're going to let the Houthis take the hit. It would have been smarter, certainly for China and Russia, no doubt about it, to let the Houthis take the hit, even i…
← Previous segment →little bit less secure, but it's only two hours before the strike—it's pretty unlikely that any notice is going to get to them in two hours. So life is just one decision after another. But if you were to read the news, it would look like half opinions. You know, a real opinion is you take the positive and the negative risks of everything you do. Okay, it could go this way, but it could go that way. You know, get some benefits, but there might be a cost. But if the only thing you do is look at there might be a cost, you wouldn't do anything.
Well, there might be a cost. I'd like you to meet me tomorrow at this building and we'll have the meeting. I don't know, what if I get hit by a car on the way to the meeting? Well, that's certainly more of a risk if you're traveling than if you're staying home. So was that worth the risk? Everything has a risk to it. Everything. If you look at the fact that everything has a risk, including every single conversation that every one of those people had about every topic that was classified all day long, it's just nothing but that risk just all day long. Well, somebody might have heard it. Somebody might have been bugging this room. Somebody might be a mole. You know, that's universal anyway.
So here's the second question people have been asking me. Hey, was this whole Signal thing some kind of an op? Was it a setup from the start? My first impression was, well, I don't see how it would be. My current impression is yeah, it looks like it. I'm not at the point where I'm willing to say it was an op, but it looks like it.
So here's what we know. This is according to an X account called The Researcher. So something called American Oversight—so this is another one of those, you know how the NGOs all have these generic names, and when you hear one of these generic names it's some damn Democrat op. So American Oversight is suing Hegseth, Gabbard, and Ratcliffe, etc., saying that their messaging on Signal is a violation of the Federal Records Act. Huh. Who do you think is on this American Oversight group? Well, apparently it's David Brock and Norm Eisen. Remember I tell you that if you know what happened, you don't know anything. You have to know who. If the only thing you knew was that they were getting sued over a Federal Records Act, you might say to yourself, oh well, I guess somebody in the government takes that pretty seriously. But it's not that. It's the most devious, weaselly, despicable, lying pieces of shit that you've ever seen in your life: Norm Eisen and David Brock. Now if you don't know about those two guys, do a little research. They are not associated with good acts whatsoever. They are associated with the darkest, weaselly, just terrible, terrible activities. And so sure enough they're behind that, and they seem to be ready to go pretty quickly, surprisingly. And then they used to have a subgroup of this American Oversight called CREW. And according to The Researcher, that was the lawfare arm or their effort to target Trump originally. So there was a subset of people, probably lawyer-like people, who would do the lawfare going after Trump.
Now why is that important? Well, there was a member of that group named Alex Wong who is being accused of being the staffer for Ratcliffe who added the journalist, who added Jeffrey Goldberg. And then on top of that, the j
Context —
udge who's been selected for this, who is randomly selected, totally randomly, is somebody named Judge Boasberg. Have you heard of him? Again, if you knew what was happening, you wouldn't know anything. If you knew who, you might know everything. So Boasberg, he's the activist judge who is blocking Trump from deporting violent gang members. He's the one who delayed, intentionally delayed, the rele…
Next segment → →