Back to episode — Episode 2808 CWSA 04/13/25
Context —
t makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. You know, the responsible thing to do would have been to not do a podcast because I'm really not capable. Like, I'm not joking. I am absolutely not capable of doing this. But we'll see what happens. If you want to see a train wreck, you came to the right place. I often tell you it's a superpower to not be e
← Previous segment →mbarrassed about things. No embarrassment at all. I'm just degraded by 80%. So I have no idea what's going to happen.
Well, what else can coffee do for you? According to new research, coffee can help protect your liver. That's why I soak my liver in coffee every day and you should too. So is there anything that coffee can't do? No. No, we can do it all.
Here's some news that I can't get enough of from the legal news. Apparently the state of Illinois is suspending their DEI scholarships because the Department of Justice went after them for being a bunch of racists. I can't get enough of this. Every time DEI is banned because the government says it's racist, I just feel like I'm redeemed. You know, it feels like 35 years of my life have finally been validated. So yes, no DEI scholarships at several universities in Illinois. So good for the Department of Justice.
Well, it turns out that threats work. Something I didn't know until recently. Apparently the US and Mexico have had this very long-term water agreement where we give them water from one of our sources, but they give us water from one of their sources. And it's all for the farmers, I think, mostly for the farmers. And Mexico was going to reduce the amount of water. And Trump threatened them with tariffs. And suddenly they released the water. So how many times has Trump threatened somebody and it worked? You know, you don't want to think that threats work, but apparently they do. Yeah, Trump's threats work pretty well. So Mexico, we got our water. Thank you.
So here's something radical and dangerous. There are now several states that are getting together to put together what they call a criminal referral for a number of the characters that you remember from the pandemic. Fauci, Birx, Walensky, and a bunch of others. And what do you think they're being referred for? Now, referred just means somebody's recommending that the Department of Justice do something or in this case, I guess the states. I think wasn't it Fauci who has a pardon for any federal crimes? So you have to go after him in the states if you want to get any traction.
So the Verus Law Group and then former feds group Freedom Foundation, they've submitted their evidence and their plan for these guys. But listen to the crimes that they're accusing Fauci and Birx of. Murder. They're accusing them of murder, negligent homicide, involuntary manslaughter, medical coercion and abuse, kidnapping, kidnapping, human trafficking for forced labor, racketeering, operating a corrupt organization, and terrorism.
I feel like they had a good idea, which is to use the states to go after some people who maybe have some things to explain. But once you add terrorism and kidnapping, I feel like you lose a little bit of credibility. You know, murder was bad enough, but you could see where murder would come from. But terrorism? How do you get terrorism out of that?
All right. RFK Jr. saying that the deep state is real, and he called his FDA employees, so these are employees under him, he called FDA employees sock puppets of the industry according to Politico. Can you imagine if your boss called you a sock puppet of the industry? The entire point of the FDA is to regulate the pharmaceutical industry. But of course they get owned because the pharmaceutical industry has so much money. And they can do things like saying, you know, you're the kind of person that we would hire for an outrageously high salary once you're done with the FDA. But that would sort of depend how you do when you're at the FDA because if you were to rule against us, I just wouldn't be able to recommend you for a job here after your FDA stint. So it's really easy to capture somebody who's working there.
But just imagine your boss calling you out as a puppet. Your entire job is to protect the public, but he's calling you out as somebody who is not protecting the public and is only protecting the bad guys. That's pretty extreme. So we'll see if RFK Jr. can survive any of this. But so far he's going hard at it. I think he's hitting the deep state and the bureaucracy all at the same time. So we'll see.
How many of you saw that photo of Governor Gretchen Whitmer? So apparently she was invited to the White House because there was some executive order that Trump did that even though she's a Democrat, it was good for Michigan. So she was happy that Trump was doing something and when he invited her to the White House, she said, "Oh, okay." So she goes to the White House and then she gets herded into a room with a bunch of other people for what was going to be a photo shoot and she's a Democrat and she wants to run for, I'm guessing wants to run for president, and suddenly she would be photographed with all these Republicans and sort of celebrating Republican victories.
So how do you think she handled it? What was her professional way of handling the fact that she got tricked into a photo shoot but was expecting just to meet the president one-on-one? She holds a binder. She holds a binder over her face so that the photographs just show the bottom of her. So instead of being invisible, she does the opposite. It becomes the biggest story because it's so weird. So now there's not a single person in the country who doesn't know that she was in the Trump White House getting her picture taken. She choked.
I don't know what I would have done in that situation. I mean, maybe I would have asked to leave or something, but it's hard to leave if the president's invited you in the room. You can't really walk out. It'd be an insult. So I guess she figured the best thing she could do is cover her face with a binder.
Anyway, according to the publication The Independent, female frogs fake death to avoid unwanted advances from males. Now they weren't specific, but I believe they
Context —
mean male frogs, not just every kind of male. But it sounds a lot like a wife faking death, except when humans do it they fake a headache. But frogs are more committed. You know, they're more like the Democrats of amphibians. So they're more into the drama of it. It's like instead of pretending I have a headache, which doesn't really work in the frog world because the boy frog is just going to go…
Next segment → →