Back to episode — Episode 2823 CWSA 04/28/25
Context —
ho was making the autopen sign things for Biden. Now that might be a little extreme, but here's what Trump said. He goes, "Also, why did the autopen give Schiff a pardon? Biden knew nothing about it. Who operated the autopen? That is the biggest question being asked in DC." Is it? I don't know. "They almost destroyed our country. They should all be in jail," Trump said on Truth Social. Now, how…
← Previous segment →g that's being hidden. And it's more than the fact that the autopen signed a lot of things for Biden. We really need to know who was behind that. I wonder if we ever will.
Mace's account on X has a good report here about how the fake news works. So Mace says the mainstream media feeds off its own dishonest reporting, working together to divide the country and make people angry. And she says, for example, the New York Times put out a headline claiming that Trump was going to end funding for Narcan. Narcan is the thing that has saved your life if you have a fentanyl overdose or opioid overdose. But that was never true. The details were buried in the article. What was true is that they wanted to reorganize the group that made the Narcan available. So it would still be available. It would just be housed in a different organization.
So rather than correct that, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC tells her viewers that Trump is taking away Narcan and then she has Jamie Raskin on later to confirm it. So they've got fake news and then they bring on another liar, the designated liar. Jamie Raskin is one of the Democrats I call the designated liars because the designated liars will do things that the normal Democrats won't, right? So if you want to tell a really big lie, one that's easy to debunk, Raskin will do it. Schiff will do it. Swalwell would do it. But most of the normal Democrats don't want to say something that's so easily debunked. So they have designated liars. I've never seen anything like it. They're literally the designated liars.
Anyway, so this is sort of like an instant wrap-up smear. Do you remember when Nancy Pelosi was explaining the wrap-up smear where you leak to a reporter that somebody did something bad and it might not be true, but then when the reporter writes the story, then you say, oh, look, it's in the New York Times, so it must be true. But really, it's only in the New York Times because you told them to
Context —
write the story and they believed it. That's a wrap-up smear. So this is an example of that, but happening in real time. Do you know the author Malcolm Gladwell? He looks like one of those dandelions. You know, when a dandelion goes bad and it's got that big crazy white hair, he kind of looks like a big dandelion. Anyway, he's getting a little more political and he's suggesting that somebody like…
Next segment → →