Back to episode — Episode 2834 CWSA 05/09/25
Context —
gure out in advance which businesses were likely to manipulate or bend their earnings reports essentially fraudulently make claims about their earnings so that their stock wouldn't go down. So they used AI to see if they can identify the language that's used when they're hiring people for the job of reporting the earnings and doing the calculating. And they found out that the ones who were plannin…
← Previous segment →that? Nobody. There's no actual way that in the real world real people could change on a dime from it's our highest priority to oh well it turns out that it's actually just illegal and we're just a bunch of racists and we better cut this out right away. Nobody can do that. They're all going to turn into secret underground railroad heroes. We'll just change the names of our department. We'll just hide. All right we'll say we got rid of the web page but we'll just keep doing it like we always do it. I don't think any of these victories are going to be lasting. I think the DEI racist approach will just become permanent. I think it is permanent. I just don't see anything that's going to change it. I hate to say it but every claim I was getting all excited because the Trump administration was doing all the right things to attack the DEI practitioners. I don't think any of it's going to work because they would be willing to take enormous risks to stay illegal because they think they're the angels.
According to the University of Pittsburgh they did a study a Pitt Michigan study and they found out that women who have both high math and verbal abilities are less likely to go into STEM careers. But if they have higher math abilities and lower verbal they're a little more likely to want to go into STEM. So this is all part of an effort to figure out how to get more women who are both high math and high verbal to go into STEM.
Now they're speculating that the reason that the group with the most capability the women with the most capability are not as likely to go into STEM is that they have more options. So if they have high verbal well you could also be an author or you could also be the head of a company or you could be the CEO or something. So you're not limited. So you just decide other things.
But my question is this. How long are we going to pretend that you can hypnotize women into doing what they don't want to do? Don't you think the entire problem boils down to well they just don't want to do that? And no matter how much you try to convince them they're still going to look at it and say yeah I mean I would be good at that but I don't want to do it. Doesn't look like fun. I have options. So it feels like we're just spinning our wheels on that.
Speaking of women you probably heard Fox News is reporting this that at the Columbia University protest that some would call anti-Semitic I guess it was it. So it was a pro-Palestinian but maybe it was too close to pro-Hamas protest. And there were a bunch of arrests because it happened at Columbia University. But of the 80 people arrested there were only 19 males but 61 females. So how do you explain that it's mostly females in that particular demonstration?
Well I think it's because the men were in STEM programs and they didn't have the time. No I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. It had nothing to do with
Context —
STEM. But I'm going to give you my speculation and it goes like this. It's super sexist. Are you ready? I don't think women have the same biological aptitude for military security. I don't think women have the same biological aptitude for military security. Here's what I mean by that. Only men know how deadly men are. Women can observe it and they can be victims of it but they can't truly underst…
Next segment → →