Back to episode — Episode 2838 CWSA 05/13/25
Context —
you real news about other people, probably not. The credentials committee—in another story that sounds like the same story because it's so disgusting—but the Democratic National Committee, the ones who had elected David Hogg as their co-chair, there's something called the credentials committee. So the Democratic National Committee has a credentials committee and they voted that the Hogg election…
← Previous segment →e things, but if you're following the news or my podcast, you know that young men are the biggest uptick in church. There's a much bigger trend toward young men wanting to become religious and wanting to become conservative. And apparently enrollment in the military is way up which is mostly young men.
Now why do young men volunteer to be in the military? Now in some cases they might think it's their best economic play, you know, depending on what they're prepared for. But to me it seems like the trend is away from wanting to just get laid and have fun. Even drinking is down. You know, the amount of drinking is down among the young.
I think young men are seeking meaning. And I guess Charlie Kirk did a good job of saying that young men are far more, if you're looking for a trend, they're trying to find some meaning. Because the old days, everybody was just getting ready to be a good husband and that option seems to be decreasing. I mean, they still might want it, but it just doesn't seem to be as available because of economics and other things.
So I think once again, the Democrats just don't understand their own public. You know, it'll always be true that young men want to get laid and have fun, but the search for meaning just seems like a bigger deal to me in terms of a direction for things.
Now here's a, I don't know if this is a trend or just a thing, but have you noticed that there's a gigantic difference in the mental capacity of Democrat supporters versus Republican? Now, I'm not saying that if you measure the IQ of one group versus the other there'd be a difference. I don't know that there would be.
But in terms of the people who are prominent, if you look at who's prominent on the Democrat side, you get people like Hogg and Jasmine Crockett, you know, just to pick two. Now, they're not really the brightest people, at least in terms of politics.
But I've said this before. I think I said this on X and Elon Musk agreed with me on X that the smartest people seem to have all moved to the Republican side because it's the common sense side. It's hard to be smart and be opposed to common sense.
But just to give you a sense of the difference between the Democrat side saying just one crazy thing after another and the Republicans. The Republicans have on their side I would say you've heard of Data Republican. So Data Republican, a woman who is just great with data and has surfaced things that would be hard to surface just because she's good with data.
So recently she put together a giant spreadsheet that you could download and you could check yourself that shows all where George Soros gave his money. So you can see the Soros grants. I guess Alex Soros at this point. Now, isn't that useful to actually understand the real world? You'd want to know where Soros put his money.
Now, who on the Democrat side could do that? They don't have Data Republican. That's just something on one side. Who on the Democrat side has a Mike Benz who can explain to you in great detail all of the NGOs and how the money has been essentially laundered and you know how the CIA is all part of it etc.? They don't have a Mike Benz.
Wh
Context —
at about Victor Davis Hanson? You know, they do have some historians on the Democrat side, but they just seem like crazy partisans. You know, they don't sound as authoritative or as smart or as balanced as Victor Davis Hanson. What about, I'm going to throw Charlie Kirk in here. If you haven't seen Charlie Kirk's videos of all the public events he's doing, where he does a public debate with anybo…
Next segment → →