ce there's no evidence that that happened, even the MSNBC host very quickly said, "Well, attended a fundraiser, but there's no evidence that they actually donated anything." So it makes me wonder if the Paramount lawsuit and wasn't there also a CNN lawsuit, it makes me wonder if Trump has finally broken through where if they know there's a lie that somebody says in their ear, "Ah, you better correct that." Kind of like The View. You know, the ladies of The View have to keep doing these legal statements because their producer talks in their ear and says, "Ah, there's no evidence of that. You better say that's not true." So maybe something good is happening from all these lawsuits.

According to Fox News, the State Department and Marco Rubio say they're going to be aggressively getting rid of, I won't say getting rid of, but they're revoking visas for Chinese students. Aggressively revoking visas. I don't know how you do it aggressively. Do you snarl? "Give me your visa. I'm revoking it aggressively." This does make me wonder how much safer the country will be if we stop educating foreign leaders, potential foreign leaders, in America. I don't know. Are we going to be better off or worse off? I guess we'll find out.

Trump said he would consider pardons. He's not saying he would do it, but he's recently been made aware of the situation where, do you remember there was a plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, but the FBI was sort of behind the plot and convinced people to do it. Well, maybe they didn't have to try too hard because I guess at least one of the men was pretty actively suggesting doing it. And so he's going to look at that. But I don't think this one is the cleanest one. It's not like the January 6 stuff that I thought was, except for the most violent people, a pretty clean one. But we'll see. We'll see if Trump wants to test his powers.

Well, there's a hoax that the reason that Trump is going after Harvard so hard is because Barron once applied there and was turned down. But Melania issued a statement, which is kind of rare that she would even get involved, and she said Barron did not apply to Harvard. So that's a hoax. Barron never applied to Harvard.

So the Biden auto-pen scandal, you know when that first broke I thought it was going to be sort of a nothing. I thought okay, there's a log that will show who signed why. It'll show that Biden approved it. It'll just sort of go away. But it turns out that there is no log whatsoever of who authorized or who used the auto-pen. Now, can you think of anything more ridiculous than that? Think of all the rules and regulations and laws that the government does. And maybe the single most important thing they could do is keep a record of who used the auto-pen and who authorized it. And apparently that's never been a requirement. So there exists no record whatsoever of who used the auto-pen for what. So Representative Comer is going to look into it and he might have even Jill Biden and Hunter Biden and Karine Jean-Pierre. So all the usual people might be called in. We don't know if they'll all go, but they might be called.

But on the same topic, there's a Project Veritas undercover video of David Hogg saying that it was a well-known, what do you call it, an open secret that the real power behind the throne was Jill Biden's chief of staff, Anthony Bernal. And I don't know if that means that he was behind the auto-pen, but the reveal is if you wondered who had the most power behind the curtain. According to David Hogg, other people might have different opinions, but according to him, it was Jill Biden's chief of staff. Now, does that ring true to you? Like when you hear that it was Jill Biden's chief of staff, does that sound like something that maybe is true? Because it totally sounds true to me. Can't you imagine that if Joe Biden was mentally incompetent that Jill Biden's opinion probably counted for a lot because she could get him to say whatever she needed him to say. But since she was not maybe as involved in politics at the detail level, it seems like she could have been easily influenced by her own chief of staff. So when I first heard that story, I thought to myself, that totally makes sense. Like if you just know the ordinary dynamics of people, the wife would have the most control over the husband, but the chief of staff would have the most control over the wife because she would take his opinion as being somewhat correct and authoritative. So maybe we know more.

And then The Post Millennial is writing about how there's a watchdog group, an environmental watchdog group, that says there's no evidence that Biden knew he was signing any climate executive orders. Now there's no evidence partly because there's no log of who signed what or why, but they're pointing out that Biden ordered it but he never really talked about it. And although that's not proof, it's definitely a head-scratcher, isn't it? Can you imagine Trump signing an executive order for something that's really expensive? There's just billions of dollars involved. And can you imagine Trump never mentioning it? You can't. Of course he would mention it because he'd be happy about what he did. It would be a big deal and it would be one of the many things he told everybody about as soon as he thought of it and as soon as he did it. But when you see that Biden may have auto-penned the approval for some environmental things that were really, really expensive and never mentioned it. Well, it could be because he was mentally incompetent. So even if he agreed with it and even if he approved it, they were a little afraid of putting it in front of the public. So it's not proof, but it is a really good question. Did he have any knowledge that it happened? So that'll be one of the things that maybe Representative Comer can find out.

Well, according to a guest on the Benny Johnson podcast, Susan Crabtree has a scoop and she says that that bag of cocaine that Dan Bongino says they're going to look into more closely, that the bag of cocaine had some DNA on it. Uh oh, DNA. And that would mean that they know exactly who touched it. At least one person. So they might already know whose it was. I suppose if the fingerprint was somebody that they didn't have any prior experience with, they couldn't really be sure. But if it's Hunter Biden's DNA just to pick a random person, well then they would know who it belonged to. But there's also part of the story that the Se