victed for doing something that had no victims and no evidence of any crime. What did they convict her of? I'm a little confused.

And do you remember Virginia Giuffre who recently died tragically? She was claiming that she was victimized many times and there were many other people on the island who were victimized. Did they talk to all of those other people? Did they talk to all of the young women who were allegedly victimized on the island and not one of them named a name? Does that sound right?

So let's just say, and then this old man, which is the name of an account on X, posted this. I can't believe Epstein killed himself right before he was about to be acquitted due to a complete lack of evidence. Yeah, why would he kill himself if there was no evidence he did any crime? It's so bad. You know, this is obviously a crime against the public. Don't you feel like the crime is against you at this point? Yes, you do. The crime is against us, but it's so bad this just seems funny.

And then Mike Benz reminds us on X the Alex Acosta. So he was the DOJ official who gave Epstein the sweetheart plea deal back in 2008. So you remember there were sort of two waves of justice against Epstein. One got wrapped up by Alan Dershowitz who did a good job of lawyering for him apparently and he got sort of a good deal that nobody believed it could be that good and so he got out of jail free. But Alex Acosta the DOJ person in charge of that was quoted as saying he was told to back off of Epstein because he belonged to intelligence. So that's the DOJ guy telling us directly that he was told to back off because he's part of the intelligence network. Do you think he would make that up? Do you think that the Department of Justice person who was working on the case would just make up, just completely invent or hallucinate that he had been told to back off because Epstein's part of the intelligence world? Well, it's not likely, but it gets better.

Apparently Acosta had 11 months of emails that were for that time period that also fill in the blank. What happened to 11 months of his emails? What do you think? Let's see how well you can guess. Oh yeah. They disappeared.

So how many things have disappeared now? Virginia Giuffre, the main witness, she disappeared because she died young for reasons that I don't know were innocent, but it's part of a pattern. So we lost all this guy's emails. We lost all the videos and tapes that were at Epstein's house, and we lost the video of the cell. And apparently Epstein did not keep records of his clients. Does any of that sound real to you?

Well, how many of you remember that I've been telling you since the beginning that even though Trump was now claiming that you're going to see everything that could be seen and even though I believe that Kash Patel meant it when he said we're going to release everything and even though I told you that I think Dan Bongino is an honest guy and when he told you that they're going to get to the bottom of it and release it, they meant it. And even though you knew there was something there and you trusted Trump and you trusted Bongino and you trusted Kash Patel for this topic, I still predicted that there would be nothing coming out from the Epstein files. Does anybody remember me making that prediction over and over again? I think I probably said it 20 times in public or posted it that we'll never see the Epstein stuff.

Well, what do you think now? Now I'm sure some of you felt the same thing, but do you have any doubt what's going on here? It's almost so clownishly obvious what's going on. It's almost as if Kash Patel and Bongino want you to know the truth. Because I'll say again, I believe that Bongino and Kash Patel are honest guys who meant it when they said we're going to tell you everything, but they're clearly not telling us everything. So what would change that? It's exactly what it looks like. Somebody got to them and said, "I know you want to do this. I know you want to do the right thing. I know you're honest people and I know you promised the public. Here's why you can't do it. There would be real problems. Like really, really big problems. As in, it might take down a government. It might take down a government, but not ours, but it might take down some government."

So I don't even know if we're protecting our own people or our own CIA or you know that's the obvious thing you think of but it could be we're protecting some other government or governments and that's not nothing. So let me give Kash Patel and Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi too. I'm going to give them a little bit of cover. It goes like this. If you put me in their situation and I had promised you I'm definitely going to show you all of this stuff that we find and then somebody came to me and said, "Look, you're not going to believe this, but if you release this stuff, one of our NATO allies will go down and we just can't do that." Could they talk me into not releasing it and also lying about why I couldn't release it? And the answer is yes. They absolutely could talk me into it.

Now maybe my example is not the greatest one, but if they had an example where people would die or nations would fall and they're nations that are our allies or somebody would be murdered. I could be convinced that there was a national security reason to lie to the public because remember if you are a spy or you are protecting national security sec