Back to episode — Episode 2901 CWSA 07/18/25
Context —
o come back. Are you ready for this? Apparently Democrats are trying to roll out a new tone. So they had a retreat in which they, you know, the Democrats got together to strategize what to do differently. And of course they noticed that Trump is doing well. So they're saying, all right, why don't we do more of what Trump is doing? And what do you think that is? Well, he uses social media a lot, h…
← Previous segment →ay podcast, which is really good. We don't know, and nobody has asked, how many times did Trump go to Epstein's homes in the United States? Don't know. How many times did Epstein visit Trump in any of his locations? Don't know. Isn't it weird that we don't know that? Wouldn't those be the obvious questions?
So the fact that this Epstein story gets deeper and more weird every day is just blowing me away. Like, you thought you knew the general contours of the story. How in the world are we still finding out things about it? I don't know.
Anyway, so the news story from the Wall Street Journal is that when Epstein turned 50, Ghislaine Maxwell organized a bunch of birthday cards that she put in a binder and they were from prominent people and friends and stuff. And allegedly one of the birthday cards Epstein was written and a little drawing was put in it by Trump.
Now, Trump says it's a fraud and that he did not write that message. I'll tell you what the message is in a little bit, but it was a kind of a personal message that looked like they had secrets, and suddenly that's a story.
Now, if you were the Wall Street Journal and the biggest part of your story is that they had seen a—oh, there it is. Is that it? Oh my goodness. Uh oh my. So right now, for the very first time, I'm seeing what they claim was Trump's drawing on the card. And what they said was that he signed his name to look like the pubic hair on the naked woman that he drew. And I'm looking at it for the first time. I guess Mike Benz posted it and I'm seeing it in the comments now for the first time.
It's very obvious that he did not sign his name to be part of her private parts. It's literally he just signed his name at the bottom of the drawing and it just happened to go across part of the body. So the first thing you need to know is that the news was completely lying to you that he signed his name so it looked like pubic hair. You would only believe that if you'd never seen it. I'm looking at it right now.
And well, actually, I can show it to you because it's on my other device. Let's see. Can you see that? So look where the signature is. If I can get it so the light doesn't destroy it. All rig
Context —
ht. You can see it a little bit there. But does that look like he meant his signature to be pubic hair? No. It's just him signing it at the bottom of the drawing. That's all. Now, if you've ever seen Trump sign anything or do anything, he always uses that big thick pen. But here's a little drawing that doesn't look like the sure hand of Trump. Trump has that heavy hand. So even when he's just sig…
Next segment → →