like it's all one big ball of the same thing. And that if you know for sure that Russia or there's no evidence that Russia tried to directly change the vote, that that is a debunk to the claim that they hacked some email and it might have affected the election. Probably didn't. Or that they had some memes on social media that tried to affect the election but probably didn't cuz they were so minor. Am I wrong? I want to see your opinion. When you hear this story, doesn't it feel like they tried to connect dots that don't connect? I feel like there's nothing in this story cuz I don't remember any time I ever believed it. Was it even public? Did the Democrats literally claim that Russia hacked into our election infrastructure? When was that ever in the news?

Kabo Mate is saying, "Scott, they got rid of the report of no finding of Russia collusion and then met to plan the coup to unseat Trump." Oh, they it definitely was a coup. So I'm not questioning whether or not there was a Democrat coup and a hoax. That is for sure. What I'm questioning is if this new information adds anything to anything. I don't think it does because all it's saying is that the IC community said no election infrastructure was successfully hacked by Russia. Was that ever really a claim? I don't remember that even being a claim. Do you know why that would not have been a claim? Have you connected the dots yet? We were told that the one thing we know for sure is that there was no way to hack our elections directly, as in there was no way for any hacker, be they Russian or be they anyone else. There was no way for them to penetrate our systems because they were too secure. So if the Democrats had been claiming that Russia had the ability to hack our election system infrastructure, they would have had to admit that it was possible to hack our election system infrastructure. And the entire time I remember the Democrats were saying and the fake news that supported them were all saying there is no way that anybody could hack this system and not get caught. So if they had claimed that Russia had indeed hacked it and not been caught, that would make our entire election system look unsecure. So I don't even think there's anything new that's important about this story, but we'll see. We'll see how everything gets conflated. But yes, I do believe that Brennan and Clapper and Obama probably belong in jail. My current thing is that what they did was a jailable offense and that they did literally try to overthrow the government of the United States twice. Once with the Russia collusion hoax and then a second time with the January 6th insurrection hoax which was probably designed to make sure that Republicans never rose again which would be another form of election interference. So to me there are two very obvious well-documented attempts to overthrow the normal workings of our elections and we know exactly who was behind all of them. You know throw in Nancy Pelosi to the January 6 stuff. So we've known forever that the Steele dossier was debunked from the start. That's not new. So what I'm saying is that there's nothing new. We knew that they knew that it was debunked and that they went with it anyway, which is why I say they should all go to jail. They should all go to jail. But we knew that. There's nothing new.

Have you noticed, some of you probably have found this out, if you're not following Mike Benz on X, do you really understand anything that's going on in this world? I feel like if Mike Benz didn't exist, I would be so confused about what the world really is and how it works. But he has this almost unnatural ability to understand insanely complicated government things. Not only in terms of all the moving parts, which is so impressive I can't even express it. But he knows the history as well. So he knows all the moving parts today. You know, the names of entities and people connected to things that you and I would never know, but also how that connects to everything in the past. So when there's one of these stories, I have to wait to hear what he says to get it in the proper context. So we need more of that.

So what he's saying now is that the DOJ motion. So the Department of Justice has requested because a lot of MAGA supporters have asked for this to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts. Now, I'm no legal expert, but it seems to me that that will be declined that I don't believe that the court will agree to release any grand jury transcripts. And if they did, it would be highly redacted to the point of being useless. So I don't think it's going to work. But then Mike Benz weighs in and he says, "Kudos to the Pam Bondi DOJ for launching this motion so quickly. Not to rain on it, but if you simply walk down the DOJ hallway to OPR," so that's a department there, "and publish the full Acosta transcript." Acosta was the prosecutor in the first Epstein situation where OPR asked about Epstein's intelligence ties. You'd get easy answers immediately. What? This almost looks a little too easy to be true. Is it true that Pam Bondi can literally walk down the hallway and open the door to the OPR? I forget what OPR stands for. And ask for the document that would probably answer all of our questions about Epstein and his intelligence connections. Is that possible? And why is Mike Benz the only person who knows that down the hallway there's a door marked OPR and if you walk through it, you could have all your answers. Is that true? I mean, this would be so impressive. I mean, I'm impressed already with all the stuff that Mike Benz knows about everything, but if he actually knows that there's a doorway you can walk through to get the answer to that question and he knows where it is and he knows who has the authority to walk through that door. Okay, that's just standing ovation time. So we'll see if that happens. But I would feel like if Mike Benz ever stopped doing what he's doing, I would feel unprotected. I would feel like he's like this watcher who just understands everything we're seeing so he can warn you about where the corrupt parts are and how it works.

Now, on top of that, he also has a take on Epstein that seems to be just a Mike Benz take, but it's I'm warming to it. And the