get all excited about this one.

Apparently we have learned that the Department of Justice told Trump back in May that his name, among many other names of people, are on the Epstein files. Now, that doesn't mean he's on the client list, and there is no client list that we know of. It just means that he's mentioned as are many prominent people who knew Epstein but does not mean and there is no indication that Trump is accused of any untoward behavior. So is it possible that the real reason Trump wants the Epstein files to go away is that his name is in the files? Maybe. Yeah. Maybe. And if he knows that he was not guilty of anything, but it would give the Democrats this gigantic hammer to hammer him on endlessly. I could see why he might say, "We're done here. There's nothing to see." I don't know if that's why, but you could imagine that that would be a pretty good reason from his perspective.

I'll say again, there's no indication whatsoever that Trump is accused of any bad behavior. It's just his name is mentioned as a presumably an associate or friend of or a contact of Epstein's at one point before he banned him from Mar-a-Lago and cut all contact.

Apparently the House panel is also directing the chairman to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton about the Epstein probe according to Fox News. Now, do you think that Hillary and Bill Clinton will have anything to say that won't be a lie? I don't think we're going to learn anything from either of those two. They're a little bit too smooth. We might find out what the definition of is is and maybe Bill Clinton will say, "I did not sleep with any of those women." Well, how about this one? No, not that one either. How about this one and this one? No, not them either. I did not sleep with them. So he might be busy.

Democrat Hakeem Jeffries says, quote, "It is reasonable to conclude the Republicans are continuing to protect the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, even if that includes pedophiles." So he's talking about the non-release of all of the Epstein files, right? Because we assume there's stuff we haven't seen that would tell us something. So here is my lesson for the day. This is something I learned in hypnosis class years ago. And do you remember I told you that when Trump said he was asked some question recently, he started his answer with "I would say" and I told you that if you start with "I would say" whatever follows that is going to be a lie. You don't start a true statement that you believe in that's just a statement of truth. You don't start that sentence with "well I would say." You only do that when you're saying something that may not fully check out.

So Hakeem has a similar tell when he says "it's reasonable to conclude." You don't start your sentence with "it's reasonable to conclude" if it's reasonable to conclude and it's also true and it's obvious and it's just a fact. You just don't start with those words. "It's reasonable to conclude." So in hypnosis class, what I learned, a