ve said this well either before his Scotland trip that he's on right now or during I can't tell but he suggested that giving out rebates is possible from the billions in tariff revenue he's getting. Do you think that Trump should be talking about rebates? I guess that would be like a tax rebate to the citizens. Do you think that's something he should be talking about as opposed to paying down the national debt? I say pay down the national debt. Because that's an existential threat. I understand that people are suffering and they need money, but I really I wouldn't be delighted if that money went to rebates because people weren't expecting it. So he's probably just floating the idea, but I don't know that that would be an 80-20 idea.

I would be curious. I feel like most people would have preferred if he'd never brought it up because if he never brought it up, then they would say, "Well, here's 500 billion. Maybe in 2026 it'll be 500 billion." That goes toward the national debt. And I would say that is the best president of all time. If he actually pulled that off, I would be just amazed. Even though we know that a lot of that is coming from the profits of the American corporations, but you know, if it pays down the national debt, that's a pretty big deal. So I don't love the rebate idea.

Well, according to Breitbart News, Jasmine Jordan is writing that Media Matters, do you know Media Matters? It's a media organization that lives to defend the Democrats and attack the Republicans and it's generally considered by anybody on the right as a just a horrible entity that they wish would go away. But apparently they're having some issues. Some say they're on the verge of going out of business, but they say no. But they've racked up over $50 million in legal bills for some sketchy stuff they've been doing. So they're in legal and financial jeopardy. We don't know if it's fatal and their future is in jeopardy. So that would be another example of a media entity, although they weren't really a media entity, more like an attack dog that may be having trouble in the Trump world.

But they have quietly cut back on their attacks and slashed staff and floated the idea of shuttering operations entirely. I guess the New York Times is writing about this. But when asked about it, this is what they said. They said they have no plans to close. When a corporate entity says, "We have no plans for that," does that mean they have no plans for that? I feel like if they had no plans for it, and they didn't think it was going to happen, they would say, "Oh, absolutely, we're not going to close." But if you can't say we're absolutely not going to close and instead you say we don't have plans to close, that's a little more about the plan than it is about the closing, if you know what I mean. It shifts your attention from the are you going to close to the question of whether you have a plan for it. I do believe they don't have a plan. That doesn't mean they're not going to close or that they don't expect to.

Also Trump over in Scotland is warning Europe that they're basically killing themselves with unrestricted immigration. Immigration is killing Europe. That's his exact quote. Immigration is killing Europe. Now, do you believe that the Trump effect could be strong enough to save Europe or is it already too late? I think it's already too late. I think Europe is done. You know, might take a generation to adjust to what's happening, but there it's definitely not the Europe of my childhood. But whatever it will be, good or bad, it won't be anything like it used to be. And Trump thinks it will be bad.

So what do you think of the cover up that's happening with the new Russia hoax documents that Tulsi Gabbard has produced? Especially the part where we recently learned that Russia knew, which means that the Democrats knew that Hillary Clinton had allegedly psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness. And she was on a daily regimen of tranquilizers. Now, don't you think that should be the biggest story that we almost elected somebody who is on a lot of tranquilizers and needed it?

You know what's missing from that story? We know that Hillary has, at least in the past, enjoyed a good glass of wine. Do you believe that these are mental problems or the sign that sometimes she's drinking? If somebody said there's this woman, she seems to sometimes but not all the time have psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness. Isn't that exactly saying drunk? I mean, isn't it if I didn't give you any hints and I just said, "All right, here's a set of symptoms and it includes uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, but also cheerfulness." My first guess would be that she's an angry drunk. Right now. There's no evidence of that. But isn't that the kind of question we'd be asking if this were anybody on the right? Yeah. Yeah. Maybe it's bipolar, but I doubt it. I don't know. I feel like there's some kind of protecting people who are drinking in public. You know, we've heard that a lot of the people in Congress are drunks and maybe there's just some unwritten rule that the media doesn't focus on that because they're also drunks. That's my guess.

But the fact that the mainstream media kind of touches on this story, but they're not treating it like it's the biggest thing, the biggest story in the history of the country. It's one of the biggest stories in the history of th