to give you a solid opinion. They have to go to court. Now, if the court decides that they're not guilty, I will accept that. But this has to go to court. That there's no way that the country can heal or that history will even understand what happened unless we take this through the court system. So I think that every one of these people that have been mentioned, they need to be dragged through the court by Trump and he has a free punch. I mean, what they've done to him has been so grotesquely out of bounds up to this point that he just has the freedom that nobody else would ever have because what he's doing is setting the world straight. He has the right to rebalance and things are terribly out of balance. If the only thing he does is say, "Here's what you did to me and you made up all of this or you exaggerated it or you turned almost nothing into a big something." All I'm going to do is let the courts decide based on these documents and the whistleblowers whether any crimes were committed. And I'll just watch.

So yeah, I believe that there would not be a civil war and I believe that it would not even necessarily affect us economically or geopolitically. I feel like the Democrat party is in such disarray and they hate each other as much as they hate Republicans at this point that this is the one time in history Trump can just put the boot down. And will they say, "Oh, he's acting like an autocrat." Sure. But that hasn't made any difference yet. They would say he's acting like a king. And then we would say this is being handled by the courts and the courts are not doing anything that's illegal. This is actually what they do. So yeah, I'm all in on the fact that the risk to the country of making this an actual Department of Justice big deal. I think the risk to the country is low. I think it's low. And I think that this just has to happen now.

So when I think about all the lives that were destroyed by these hoaxes and really the country itself was essentially destroyed, we can build back, you know, I think we'll get back, but at the moment, I mean, just think about the fact that people can't even spend time with their own families. That's what this kind of hoax gets you. That plus the fine people hoax. So yeah, I'm all in on jail.

Apparently there's a report that a number of the worst documents there might be some bad ones we haven't seen yet were found in a secret locked room in burn bags. Now, a burn bag is a bag you put a document in if you're planning to have it all burned to get rid of it because you can't just throw classified stuff in the regular garbage. So why were there burn bags? Were they burn bags that simply hadn't yet been burned and there's nothing to see here? It's just stuff they didn't need. So they put them in a burn bag or I think we've already been told that the burn bags have the good stuff in them, which would suggest they knew exactly what they were doing and hid them. General Flynn notes that those burn bags probably could be fingerprinted. What did you think of that? The burn bags probably can be fingerprinted now. I hope they haven't been touched by too many other hands. They probably have been, but kind of an interesting thought, isn't it? That they could be fingerprinted.

And then there's some information about, do you remember, was it Stefan Halper, the British spy related guy who was part of that Steele dossier? And I guess he was a big part of making the fake case against General Flynn. And so General Flynn is he's going all caps on his X post today. I'll just read you what he posted. He said, "And as noted many times by Stefan Halper," so that was the British spy guy was not even there that night. He made up the whole story. He goes, "That fat bastard Halper made the entire story up." All in caps. We've always known this. The crooked cops inside the FBI and those in the White House and at the CIA all went along. All done to overthrow the United States of America. Enough is enough. Start arresting people. Yep. General Flynn, I am 100% down with that opinion. It's time to arrest people.

Well, Ghislaine Maxwell, as you know, has been talking with the House Oversight Committee. Well, actually, she's been invited to talk to them, but she will not consider it unless she gets congressional immunity, which would be different from clemency. So she wants clemency and also immunity. And she's unlikely to get any of that. So do we expect her to tell the truth if she doesn't get something in return? Well, it appears she's not going to get those things because it would be politically impossible. It would be a bad idea for Trump to grant any of that. So I'm hoping we can find out what she knows from some other mechanism.

There's a lawyer who represented nine of Epstein's victims who was on one of the shows recently and he's questioning what Dersh said about the Epstein clients not being real. Now, I did not see I did not hear Dershowitz say anything like that. So I don't want to characterize what Dershowitz said. I'll just tell you what the other lawyer says. He says, "I've represented not only the nine victims, but I've seen the evidence on behalf of the 40 victims that the FBI investigated at the time to prove conclusively that Epstein had trafficked underage girls, children as young as 14 years old, for sex. Not only that, he was using these young children but so was Ghislaine Maxwell." So she's accused of being physical as well. And then he was trading out these favors with these young people to people in Palm Beach and in the Manhattan home as well as transporting people to the islands in the Virgin Islands.

So I think we make too much of a big deal about who went to the island because he had three homes in the United States, right? New Mexico, New York, and Palm Beach, and he had lots of entertainment and parties and people going back and forth. So I don't think that who did or did not go to the island is telling you a lot because it would have been smarter for them all to just visit in one of his homes because you wouldn't have to even be on his airplane to go there. So we'll see what happens there. So it is kind of amazing that apparently there are maybe dozens of famous people who were credibly accused of very specific horrible crimes and as far as we know none of them are being prosecuted. Now, I understand that the victims may have settled and there may have been like a gazillion dollar settlements and if you had already been victimized, you might want to keep your $20 million more than you want to see somebody go to jail. So it might be tough to ever find out what happened for sure.

In other news, Media Matters. That horrible publication is sort of a pit bull for the Democrats. It's just a way to go after Republicans basically. Might get shut down. Rod Martin is writing about this on X. He's got a nice thread on this, but it was founded by David Brock in 2003. And now apparently they're drowning in legal bills. And the main reason would be Elon Musk is going after them for what was their claim? They did a fake test where it showed that X was pairing Nazi propaganda next to advertisements, but it was a fake test. So they got busted for that at least in terms of that's why the lawsuit is there, but also they would try to organize advertiser boycotts against X. So this is just the worst organization. They really should not exist. And apparently they're really sucking wind on money. And here's the funniest part. They got cut off from their law firm for not paying their bills. The law firm is Mark Elias's firm. Now, 1% of the world knows why that's funny. Because Mark Elias and that law firm also like Media Matters were just a Democrat pit bull kind of an organization. So yeah, the Democrats are falling apart entirely.

Well, in good news, there's a new robot for picking mushrooms according to The Robot Report. And that's important because mushrooms can double in size in like a day. So you have to pick them every day. Now, I saw separately I saw a broccoli picking robot. Now, these robots don't look like humanoids. They're just big tractor related things with lots of arms that identify and pick the stuff. But are we heading rapidly toward a point where farming will be almost no human labor? Because farming is very predictable. Like you know exactly what you have to do and it's not that much different. You have to get rid of the weeds, you have to pick the fruit, you got to plant the seeds. I mean, there's not much to it. So it seems that would be exactly the kind of thing you could get robots to do more and more. Then you don't have to worry about immigration to pick your food.

Well, in other news, North Carolina State University researchers have devised a way to improve the large climate models, the models that predict what the temperature will be in 50 years. And they demonstrated that their new tool makes the models more accurate. To which I say, "Wait a minute. I thought the models were already accurate or accurate enough." So about once a week I see a story where somebody says, "Oh, here was something wrong with those models. Oh, they were pretty good, but we're going to make them even better." Really? How many ways do you think you can tweak those models and still have them come up with roughly the same answer? Because if they come up with wildly different answers every time you tweak a variable or you discover a new way to do it, well then you've proven that they're useless. Ho