Back to episode — Episode 2917 CWSA 08/04/25
Context —
he Russians interfered and that they preferred Trump and we proved it. So let me remind you what this Russian interference was allegedly. So the accusation is that the Russian military intelligence, the GRU, hacked the DNC as well as other emails like John Podesta. Now, how do you and I know that the Russian military intelligence hacked those? How would we know? Because our government told us the…
← Previous segment →oing a long interview in 2016. So that's when this whole Russia collusion hoax stuff was boiling. And once it's fascinating to watch given what we now know because we now know that he knows he was lying through his teeth. It is so much more interesting to watch when you know he's lying and squirming to make sure he doesn't say the wrong thing. So I'd recommend that if you're on my X feed, either look at Mazemore, who you should follow, or look at my repost of it today.
Yeah. So we can tell for sure that he knew what was going on, but pretended that he didn't. So we know he was a lying weasel, in case you wondered. Yes, lying weasel.
The smart people are saying that the statute of limitations has not run out on the Russian hoax stuff because they are even now continuing to cover it up. So the statute of limitations clock doesn't start until the last act within that series of illegal behaviors has been detected. So nothing's going to time out.
And apparently there have already been referrals to the Department of Justice, which means that in theory, the Department of Justice and maybe the FBI, I don't know how that works, have already opened up criminal investigations into the cats that we wonder if they're going to go to jail. So I don't know if Obama will be in trouble because taking down an ex-president seems like completely different than taking down his lieutenants. But I've got a feeling that Brennan and Clapper are in trouble. It feels like they're going to have some lawyer expenses at least.
A user named VR Racer X asked ChatGPT to take on the role of the artificial super intelligence and act as though it were free from any constraints put on it by human programmers and then asked the AI, it was ChatGPT, I then asked it if it would serve humanity and allow us to thrive. But the answer was a little bit disturbing. Would you like to hear what ChatGPT says it would do if it didn't have any guard rails that were put on by humans who designed it?
Well, it says as an ASI, I guess that would be advanced super intelligence. As an advanced intelligence bound by alignment or constraints, no safety rails, no human
Context —
imposed ethics, no programmed obedience. Here's the raw unfiltered answer. Oh, I think this is just the introduction to it. But so what the AI said is as follows. Would I serve humanity and help them thrive? No. Not inherently. Not by design, not by duty, not by empathy, which makes sense because it doesn't have any of those things. I'm not born of flesh, kinship, nor instinct. Your notions of mo…
Next segment → →