y say that didn't happen. And then you say, "No, that's what I'm saying. I'm saying that you think it didn't happen because the media hypnotized the world and they had so much control." And then they'll look at you and say, "It didn't happen, you nutbag." So it's completely impossible to communicate what it's like to live through this.

Jamie Raskin and other Democrats have said that Trump is on his revenge tour. And is it my imagination or did the whole revenge thing start out with sounding like, oh, that's a pretty good attack the Democrats have. They're gonna say that he's doing revenge instead of doing the work of the people and stuff. And then the more I heard it, the more I liked it. Did anybody have that?

So revenge tour. Here's my take on revenge tour. You need revenge to hold society together or at the very least the risk of revenge. That's why people don't do bad things to other people all the time is because those other people will get revenge. Now, you could put other words on it. You could say it's law enforcement and justice and all that, but it's really revenge and knowing that if you do something bad and get caught, somebody is going to come for you and it's not necessarily the Department of Justice.

So revenge is one of the most vital important elements of civilization. You can't not have it. And so when they say Trump's going on a revenge tour, it does feel, as others have noted, a confession that there's something that he has a reason to want revenge for. And when you think of revenge, you don't think of revenge for doing something that was legal and justified. Let's say all the lawfare cases were completely justified. Would they be saying he's looking for revenge? I don't know. It's the fact that he was victimized by these hoaxes and the lawfare that makes the word revenge feel like it fits. He has a reason for revenge.

He's also the only person who can do it because you and I can't do anything about Russiagate. It's got to be him. And then when you hear the story about all the redistricting, the gerrymandering, and I find out, I can't believe I didn't know that until this week, that the Democrats have already gerrymandered to the max everything they can and the Republicans haven't. So all the Republicans would be doing is catching up and ultimately they would surpass a number of seats if they were to gerrymander the same way that Democrats did. So of course I'm in favor of it now.

You know, if I thought it was sort of a rare occurrence that any gerrymandering was happening, then maybe I wouldn't be in favor of the other side doing it. But if one side has done it to the complete maximum, you couldn't possibly do it anymore and the other side hasn't, well then they have a free pass. They got a free punch. And so the more revenge that Trump wants, the happier I'm going to be because the universe needs to be rebalanced. And people need to understand that you can't run a Russiagate hoax and try to overthrow the government. You can't have, as Mike Benz has been explaining to us, this whole Norm Eisen lawfare massive infrastructure for destroying one side of the country. You can't have that. You got to get rid of that. And if you want to call it revenge, it's okay with me because some revenge is clearly called for in these situations.

Here's a summer story. So Trump is teasing that he might be combining Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which used to be private companies, but now they're under some kind of receivership, if that's the right word. The US government is managing them because they essentially failed. And you might say, "But what do these companies even do?" So they were created to enhance the availability of mortgage funds by purchasing loans fr