ositive is if you're comparing it to some other person like Harris and you believe this should be even worse. But otherwise, just the topic itself guarantees that people have a negative opinion.

Project Veritas has some kind of a scoop and a whistleblower, but the story is too complicated for me to understand. And I remind you that nobody's credible. So I don't know what to believe, but the whistleblower has a story about somehow being personally involved in other countries bribing politicians in the US. She's naming Eric Adams, says that he took money from Turkish airlines and some other people. Let's see who else is she naming. Fani Willis. She thinks there's some evidence of Fani Willis got paid off from something. I don't know if that came from another country or that just came from the Democrats and there's some other guy who got in trouble for it. So it's a little complicated. There are too many people involved. So I'm sort of waiting to see if there's any other news sources that pick it up. Because I'm not too sure that the whistleblower is credible because no one is. And if all you have is one whistleblower and no documents, one whistleblower, that's sort of as close as you could get to the lowest level of credibility.

Now the good news is the whistleblower is not anonymous. An anonymous whistleblower would be useless, but at least she's giving her name and her picture. So maybe. Don't know.

Turns out a DC police sergeant was involved in a lawsuit because she accused her superiors of faking the Washington DC crime stats to make them look low. In other words, the bosses gave orders to charge lower offenses, I guess, so that it looked like the crime rate