Back to episode — Episode 2934 CWSA 08/21/25
Context —
e's a pretty long list, isn't there? Certainly the nutrition pyramid probably had 90% agreement of dieticians and whatnot and that was fake, right? So if you knew how many times science had been wrong when nine out of 10 scientists believed something was true, wouldn't that change how you saw the climate stuff? That would be important context and I don't know it. I don't think you know it either…
← Previous segment →I'm back.
All right. So the reason that the Democrats are losing so many registered voters, I guess there's a 4.5 million voters swing from Democrat to Republican in the last few years. And a poll by a Democrat super PAC, Unite the Country, showed that what Democrats thought of their own party is that it was out of touch, woke, and weak. Out of touch, woke, and weak. And so apparently their response to being out of touch, woke, and weak is to talk more and mock Trump more. Does that sound like what the country wants from them?
Now I would agree it might be that the poll did get those results and that that's what people said. But don't you think that being strong and not being out of touch would involve having good policies for solving our big problems as opposed to finding a clever way to do a skit that involves mocking Trump? No, the theater kids only have one play. What kind of theater can we put on to get power?
The Russia Russia gate hoax was theater, was it not? It was literally imaginary characters with an imaginary plot. It was fiction. Most of the hoaxes from the 51 Intel people with the laptop to the fine people hoax to the January 6 hoax, they're all fiction. So and then you've got Newsom who's doing this clever but not really effective mockery of President Trump by doing social media posts in his voice. To me that seems out of touch because it's not addressing any problem and it seems it's not woke, it's just ignoring woke. And it feels weak.
So do you notice that the reason that mockery of Trump works is that everybody knows how he talks? And Trump has proven that the way he talks is the most persuasive and effective way anybody could ever talk. We all kind of know that now. We didn't know that when he first ran for the first term, but at this point everybody who is paying attention knows, okay he doesn't talk like other people but it's the most effective political talking we've ever seen. So when y
Context —
ou mock the most effective political communication you've ever seen by simply matching it, you haven't really mocked anything. You haven't mocked anything because the thing that he's mocking is well understood to be the superior form of communication. If he mocked something that wasn't working, well then he'd have something, right? But you can't mock something that worked so well and made him pres…
Next segment → →