the two things, either the raw number only or the percentage only, and he's doing the percentage only, that is almost always meant to deceive you. They leave out the number because the number would give you the opposite message as the percentage. If I say the percentage is down 30%, and you didn't know from what the number was, you might agree with him and say well come on, they're doing great. Down 30%. Let them keep doing what they're doing. It might go down even further. But what if the number of homicides happened to be a thousand a month? Would you say to yourself sounds like it's going well because they're down 30%? Or would you say oh my god, a thousand people murdered per month. We better move the military in there. So the percentage tells you a totally different story than the raw number. And I don't know what the raw number is, but it's not a thousand.

So this raises a question. Will that Chicago tyranny be done by the oligarchs or the patriarchs or the white supremacists or the authoritarians? And will they steal your democracy? So these are the questions that the Democrats are raising. Are the tyranny people, the oligarchs, the patriarchs, the white supremacists, and the authoritarians, are they all in the same team? Same bunch of people? I don't know. You have to ask a Democrat. They see them everywhere. I see dead people.

Wes Moore, the governor of Maryland, said that over 300,000 people have left Baltimore, Maryland due to crime. So 300,000 out of what had been a city of 920,000. So basically a third of the city, one third of the city said I can't even live here. I'm out of here. I'm gone. You know what I say about that? That's a lot of racists. So 300,000 people, probably all of them racists, left Baltimore, and they need to be cancelled. I disavow every one of those racists.

Meanwhile, according to the Gateway Pundit, Letitia James says that Trump is weaponizing justice in his fraud case. So let's say some people say that Trump is trying to get revenge. And if you heard that out of context and you heard that a president was trying to get revenge on an American citizen, well that would sound pretty bad, wouldn't it? Now they also say that Trump is weaponizing the Department of Justice. Wow. If you hear that out of context, that's pretty bad. So two things I definitely don't want to see from my president are revenge. I don't want to see any of that. And using lawfare or weaponizing the Department of Justice, something I absolutely do not want to see. But you know what I do want to see is if those two things are put together, I'm fine with it. If he uses lawfare to get revenge, well if it's real revenge, as in somebody who has it coming, I'm completely in favor of that. Yeah. If it's somebody who lawfared you and you're lawfaring them in revenge, totally acceptable. Totally acceptable. See, now that's full context. If you give me the full context, then I like the lawfaring and I like the revenge because I would call them mutually assured destruction. And if you don't actually do the mutually assured destruction, well then it doesn't exist to keep society together in the future. Is it a big risk that the other side will escalate and everybody will be just doing it like crazy? Yes. Yes, that is a risk and it's a bigger risk than not addressing it. But it's a risk. We live in a risky world.

Trump has softened so much on TikTok probably because TikTok he