everything better is cold. That's right. A simultaneous sip.

Paul, where are you? So good.

All right. Well, let's check in with science and see if there's any work they did that maybe they didn't need to do. Maybe they could have just asked me. Oh, here we go. Fabiana Bontempo is writing about a new study that says if you're a husband, there you are Paul, if your husband has one of these jobs, he's more likely to cheat. All right, so these are the jobs of people most likely to cheat for the men: CEO, surgeon, physician, or unemployed.

All right. Well, you know, you really didn't need to do that study because let me explain to you. CEOs, surgeons, and physicians, they would be what we would call the ones that women are chasing after. And they also go to work in a place that's filled with women who are subordinate to them at their place of work. So yeah, all the men who are high targets and women are trying to sleep with them, they are most likely to cheat. But also the unemployed because they've got the time. So if you have time or a really rocking job, you're more likely to cheat. They did not need to do that as a study. They could have just asked me.

Well, Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift are engaged. Finally, the fairy tale is real. What do you think are the odds of Travis and Taylor making it to retirement and living happily ever after? Well, who would be more likely to cheat? A CEO, a surgeon, a physician, or a famous football player who's married to Taylor Swift? I don't know. She'd better put a Ring camera on that guy to follow him around. I'm just saying. It's not a comment about Travis. I'm sure he's a perfectly upstanding person, but he's in that kind of a job, you know, kind of a job. And the other most likely to cheat would probably be rock star. So they both have jobs where they have to travel around the world without the other one. So I don't know. They do have the highest odds against them.

But on the other hand, both of them have defeated very long odds to be in the jobs they're in. So if you want to put the golden age way, let's do that. Let's put the positive spin on it that if anyone could pull off the unlikely, it would be those two because they've both already pulled off the unlikeliest of unlikeliness.

According to Chris Williamson, who I believe had Rob Anderson on his show recently, and Rob was saying that married men and women disagree on how much sex they have. Okay, Rob. Again, maybe you could have asked me and I would have known that part, but there's more. Maybe I didn't know this part. That women typically believe their marriages have about the right frequency of sex, whereas men wish for more, twice as much. So it suggests that couples adjust their sexual frequency to the lower rate of desire by the wife. How could it ever be different? It would only be different if the wife took sort of a prostitute point of view and said, "I'll tell you what, some of the time I'll have this sex and I'll enjoy it. But other times I'll look like I'm just waiting for it to be over and then you can have as much as you want." Then the guy says, "I'll just take the stuff where you're into it because if they're just looking at you like, gosh, I got to do some chores, that's not really good for the guy." So yes, the man adjusts to the preference of the woman most of the time.

Well, it looks like Ring camera, speaking of them, they've got a new device that's a little drone that works inside your house when you're gone. So the drone, it's kind of a small one, will patrol the rooms of your house automatically so you don't have to do anything. It just does it by itself and creates a little video, I guess. Now, how much do you want that? I want that so much. Do you ever see a new product where you go, "I already know I'm going to have one of those someday." You know, maybe not right away, but yeah, I want one of those. I want one for the outside of the house too. I would like to know that if somebody rings a doorbell or if my security camera picks up any motion that looks like a person, that my drone on my roof, there's a flat area on the roof, I have the perfect place to stage it, would take off and do a little surveillance to make sure it's not anything bad.

Well, enough about me. Vanity Fair employees say they're going to walk out the mother effing door. That's a quote. They're going to walk out the mother effing door if Melania Trump is on the cover. Because I guess there's some talk about putting her there because there's no way they'd keep their incredibly lucky job to be at Vanity Fair if they put some beautiful model on the cover that was not their preferred political preference. I would say unless these are the most irreplaceable people in the history of magazines, I would let them walk out the mother effing door. I would say goodbye to all of them because who's running that place? Do the employees get to decide what's on the cover? I mean the lower end employees. I don't think so. So but we'll see.

Speaking of Melania, apparently she's announced a K through 12 presidential AI challenge according to The Hill. And I guess it would be like a contest and they would urge students across the country to use AI to compete I guess for who could come up with the most awesome AI app I guess. And how much do I love that? I love this so much. You know, first ladies traditionally they get involved in some cause, but often the cause is sort of a just a first ladyish kind of a thing like with lots of empathy or something with some group that deserves it. But I love the fact that Melania would be working on AI for our youth because that's like as basic to the survival of our country as anything could be. So instead of working on things like beautifying something or having better dishes or whatever she's directly working on the thing that is the only thing that would keep the country in good shape in the future. It's kind of impressive. I