l nearly as anxious or as depressed. So what I wonder is, is there anything you can measure? Probably not, because we know that depression also causes a lack of energy. But I'll bet it's far more two-way than medicine acknowledges. That's my hypothesis. That if you could fix people's energy, they would have a better mental state. Now, that's also consistent with the fact that when people exercise, they have better mental health because that's been proven a million times. What also happens when you exercise? You get better, cleaner energy, right? So all the indicators are pointing toward these mental health problems having some kind of an energy-related element to it.

Did you know that only 37% of adults have sex weekly? Now when I say weekly, that's spelled W-E-E-K-L-Y. I don't know the percentage of people who have sex weekly as in W-E-A-K-L-Y but there must be some. You want to have sex? All right. I'm done. Well, that was pretty weak. So some people do it weekly that way. I don't know how many, but the General Social Survey said 37% have it once a week. Only 37%. And a quarter of people between 18 and 29 have not had sex in the past year. To which I say, isn't that normal? I would have imagined that at any time in my life, a quarter of the people my age were not having any sex. That's what I thought.

Anyway, but I checked on Grok and porn usage is way up and people are saying, "Aha, it's that porn usage that's causing less sex in the real world." Is it? How many of you think that that's a real identifiable cause? There might be more than one. I believe there is. But how many think that porn is the reason that there's less real world sex? I wonder if it doesn't work the other way around, as in if you've decided to not have real world sex or you're unable to get it, are you just going to go without or are you going to say, "Well, at least I can fall back on this." So I've got a feeling that a lack of access to sex is one of the things that makes people look at porn. You know, if you could have sex three times a day with your favorite partners or partner, how much porn would you even be interested in? I mean, you might like a little just for a change of pace or something, but you're not going to be obsessed with it anyway. Maybe it's the phone usage, too. There's a whole bunch of reasons people are less healthy, blah blah.

So we know now that the dark money, as I mentioned, is going from Democrats to a variety of left-leaning podcasters and data. Republican figured out where the money's coming from and you can see it flowing through and getting to the podcasters. I don't believe that that exists for Republicans, right? I believe that Republicans get their influencers the honest way, which is somebody just is good at what they do and they became a good influencer. Why is it that only one side of politics has legitimate organic talented influencers and the other side doesn't have any unless they're paid and even they're not breaking through? Is that a coincidence? I mean, that would be the biggest coincidence in the world, wouldn't it? That only one side of the political world can have a really influential podcaster. I don't know.

So I guess David Pakman is allegedly one of the people who's getting paid to be a podcaster, they say.

Well, speaking of sketchy things, apparently there was an ex-postal employee who was in charge of being a postal investigator. So his job was to investigate mail fraud. Do you want to take a guess at what