Back to episode — Episode 2948 CWSA 09/04/25
Context —
than working. And I suppose you could work too, right? Because they're doing a daycare. So I guess you don't have to quit your job if you're a woman. So you can get the $72,000. You could also get leave. Looks pretty good. I saw a post from Peter Diamandis. He says if you retire at 55, you're 89% more likely to die within 10 years. And the idea is that people who have a purpose in life seem to li…
← Previous segment →bout any kind of protection. And it's from Paragon Solutions and some say it's the strongest weapon of its type.
Are you comfortable with anybody, whether it's even if it's in Israel, are you comfortable that that exists, that there's a known piece of spyware that can basically puncture everything? Terrific.
As I've been saying for a while, your privacy is purely illusionary. It's a pure illusion. And I like to say this until it sinks in, until everybody agrees with me, that the only privacy you have, the only protection you have in your privacy is being uninteresting. Nothing else. If you're uninteresting, and that would be uninteresting to law enforcement because you didn't do any crimes, uninteresting to your neighbors because nobody saw you cheating on your wife, nobody saw you doing anything interesting. So as long as you remain really uninteresting, you've got all the privacy you'd ever want because nobody gives a what you do or even who you are.
But the moment you're doing anything interesting, say you're a Fed governor just to pick one example, then people are going to find out everything they need to find out about you. Sometimes critics and enemies, sometimes law enforcement, but you don't have any privacy. You have only the ability to be uninteresting. And it's been that way for a long time because the government could always get some kind of warrant to look into your stuff.
Anyway, that ladies and gentlemen is what I wanted to say. If you just joined late, I remind you that the second edition of *Loserthink*, my book that teaches you how not to evaluate things, you know what mistakes commonly people make arguing online especially. It's basically the same as the first edition, but I had to republish it independently with Joshua Lisec because I got cancelled worldwide. So it wasn't the book itself that got cancelled, but my publisher cancelled everything I had and people were saying, Scott, can you make that one available again because it's quite popular.
So the best way to use it is if you see somebody using a bad way of thinking, I encourage you to take a picture of the page in the book in which I describe why it's a bad way of thinking and you just post it on X. So because it's in a book, it will make you feel like it's official. You'll win every argument.
All right, I'm going to talk privately to my beloved subscribers on Locals. The rest of you, thanks for joining. You'll only see me for another 30 seconds before I...