to go out in the street and say, we're just wondering if you were in charge of these big decisions at the CDC, etc., do you think that science should be used to make the decisions? How many people in the United States would say, "Oh, no, don't use the science." None. None. Well, 100% of all living humans believe that if you have science that can be depended on, you should use it for these decisions. But somehow the Democrats have convinced their idiot base that he's the only one and that Trump appointed the only person who doesn't believe in science.

Now, I will acknowledge that he may have gotten some things wrong in his pre-government work. He may have gotten some things wrong. Who doesn't get some things wrong? But in his current job, he's completely committed to using science and he says that the science we have isn't good enough. And he shows his work. I mean, he can tell you, okay, did they or did they not do a randomized control trial? Did they? If they didn't, then all he's saying is we need to do that. Did they prove that this or that is safe for children? Did they? I mean, you show us where's the study that says you prove that was safe. So all he's really doing is having a completely transparent and public conversation about do we have enough science for these things that we're pushing on people? And they try to confuse the public by conflating dropping mandates from making it unavailable. He's not making anything unavailable yet as far as I know. So do you believe that there's any scenario in which Kennedy alone would say, "Well, I've seen some secret data and so I'm going to ban this vaccination or this or that." Do you think that he would ban the COVID stuff based on the current level of science? Probably not because the current level of science may be inadequate for anything to know whether it's good or bad. So as long as everything he's doing is transparent and it's all based on data and everybody can look at it, I feel like we're pretty safe. No, I don't believe he's the only person in the whole world who believes that you should ignore science. I don't think so. But at least three-quarters of Democrats will be convinced that he is that one person.

Anyway, apparently three lawyers for ActBlue, that's that entity that puts together donations from small donors for the Democrats specifically. And they've been accused of really money laundering big donations that they're not supposed to be doing and then making them, you know, pretending that they came from lots of little donors. So that's the accusation. New York Post is writing about this, but it just made me think how much of the Democrat machine has already been disabled. Remember when Zuckerberg spent the $400 million? But now Zuckerberg is sitting next to Trump and he's not really doing that stuff in the election. That's a pretty big deal. $400 million. ActBlue. If it's true that they had some bad behavior, they might not be able to do what they've done in the past, whether it was legal or illegal, they might be crippled. So ActBlue might be taken out of the game partially. The fact that USAID and all the NGOs, we now know that game where they're really ways to fund the Democrats. I'm assuming that Marco Rubio and the administration are finding ways to starve the Democrat candidates anyway from making money through those NGOs. Then of course Trump's looking at the voter rolls and Tom Fitton was talking about this, cleaning up the voter rolls in the problem states. And if he gets away, if Trump gets away with making federal IDs necessary, I guess it would be federal IDs necessary to vote in federal elections. I think he wants something like that. And if he bans the mail-in votes and maybe even bans electronic voting machines, if you assume that he got away with all of that and then also the Republicans put massive lawyers at every polling place so that they can monitor for stuff. What would happen if we got an unusual result again where something looked like it didn't make any sense? You know, sort of like the 2020 election did where there was that big zoom for Biden votes that didn't seem to have a legitimate explanation? I don't know. Do you think that the Republicans have such a clamp on this now that the Democrats shouldn't be able to win any federal election? I mean, these things of course change in a heartbeat, so anything can reverse. But it does seem to me like the Trump administration is putting a full court press or trying to figure out all the ways that cheating could happen and get rid of them. But what we don't know is if there was any like major real cheating involved with most of those things. So we don't know. We don't know.

So Trump again in his ongoing move to change regulations when they get in the way, they're going to reclassify military drones so that they don't fall under the missile category because there's some restrictions on that. So they can sell drones to other allied countries like Saudi Arabia, these Reaper