service of saying that Trump knows that the Epstein crimes are not a hoax. He's just saying that the way the topic is being treated was a hoax I guess.

So here's the part I don't believe. We've already heard from a lawyer who was explaining when he was originally looking into Epstein that Trump was the only person who just called him and gave him all the time he wanted to say what was the deal with Epstein. Now do you think that got conflated with an FBI informant who has had some kind of formal arrangement to take down Epstein and that we're just finding out about this now and that there was apparently no reason we wouldn't know about it because Mike Johnson just sort of casually said it like it was no big deal?

But if it was no big deal why would we just be finding out about it now? Does any of that track? How many of you think this story is complete and it's just what you thought it was? That he was literally a secret that Trump was literally a secret FBI informant on Epstein and that we didn't find out about it until yesterday. Does that really track?

So here I have to give it the really test where all you do is you say "really" in a sarcastic way and see if it fits. So he was an FBI informant the whole time. Really? Really? Really? Yeah. See what I mean? The really test is kind of a useful one in this one. So I mean maybe it's exactly true but it doesn't feel like it.

Well Newsmax is telling us that the Republicans are looking at Kansas and Nebraska as states that they might want to go into for redistricting which would give the Republicans more seats in the House.

Now I'm kind of loving the fact that even though maybe it's not technically true it sort of looks like Gavin Newsom was lured into starting a redistricting fight where there was more mutually assured destruction except that it wasn't mutually assured. So Newsom needs to learn the difference between destruction, in this case self-destruction of Democrats, and mutually assured because I think that when Newsom said in his raspy voice, if you're going to redistrict in Texas I'll tell you what I'm going to do, I'm going to redistrict here right here in California. Now he probably would say that with more jazz hands sort of like that.

But I don't think he realized that if he reciprocated that it would cause Republicans to empty the quiver and just shoot every arrow that they had at the same time and say well we would have stopped with Texas. You know honestly we weren't really even thinking about those other states. We would have stopped with Texas but if you want to go full quiver we'll give you all our arrows. Sure why not?

So that may not be like I said what I just described as more of a narrative not exactly an objective picture of truth but that's what it looks like. You know it's a funny narrative.

Well for my other favorite funny story of the day, these are good Saturday stories, not too serious. Well it's very serious for this one person. So you know Kilmar Abrego Garcia, he's the gentleman who got deported to El Salvador. I hope I'm not mixing up my stories. I think that's the guy.

And then the lawyers and everybody said no he can't go back there or that's the one place he can't go back to. And then they couldn't figure out where to deport him to because it was okay to deport him but it would depend where he got deported. And then I guess he gave the government a list of over 20 countries that he thought he didn't want to be deported to because they would to