ay with it because they wouldn't personally be blamed. Oh, I'm just one person who said a few words. You know, if there were hundreds and hundreds of people on TV saying a few words, well, you can't put me in jail for that.

David Axelrod, famed Democrat consultant sort of guy, he torched the Democrats over a few what he calls the mistakes. He said it was insane to spend three years before he did something serious about the border. Insane. And then he also said it was wrong not to be much more active in trying to reopen schools. Does it strike you as odd that these two problems that every Republican understood were gigantic problems that the Democrats had to wait a year after they were out of office to even admit that? Oh yeah, this was like insane. Just insane. Did he not know that at the time? I think he did. I think he did know that was insane, at least the border part.

And then Axelrod is complaining about the Republicans who may have used the word war recently, as in we're in a war with the other side. And he said, the words have specific meaning. When you say you're in a war, it's an invitation for people to commit acts of violence. And it didn't take long for social media to catch this on X. There's a clip of Chris Murphy, prominent Democrat, who was saying, you know, I think the day before Charlie Kirk was killed, he said, "We're in a war to save the country. You have to be willing to do whatever is necessary." Now if you say the context is a war and then you say you have to do whatever is necessary that does allow killing. That would be whatever is necessary to some people, not to me obviously. So Axelrod I would sort of partially agree that war is a fighting word but when I see Republicans talk that way, I know that they don't mean it literally, but when Democrats talk about Trump being the next authoritarian Hitler, they mean it literally. I mean, not that he's going to have a little mustache and change his name to Hitler, but that he would act like that. I believe they mean that literally. I've never heard any Republican who would believe that we're in a literal war as opposed to a political one.

Anyway, Trump has ordered the State Department to expand their screening to disallow people who are trying to get into the country on visas to disallow them if they've said bad things about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And I guess they're using AI to search for things that they might have said. Now, I'm happy about that. I feel like you don't get to come in the front door and be our guest unless you're saying good things, at least on day one. I mean, you know, you shouldn't have a history of criticizing the country and then trying to get into it. So I'm all right with that. I don't know if that will pass any legal muster, but I'm definitely okay with it.

Andrew Tate, who sometimes has gone quiet, but now he's re-emerging. He was on Piers Morgan Uncensored, and he says one of the problems, the big problems in the country is women voting. And he says, "Who votes for liberalism? Who votes for soft on crime? Who votes for open borders? Who votes for DEI by and large? Male or female? Which sex? Female." So he says, "Why was this woman, you know, the Ukrainian woman who got stabbed on the light rail train?" He says, "Why is this woman going to work and riding the tram alone at night instead of thinking this is dangerous?" She believed that she can go and fend for herself. Bad things happen when we ignore reality. Society was built by evil, misogynistic men. I love the honesty of that. And then these feminists came along and destroyed it all. I believe in protecting women because I don't believe they can fight. And he says, "If that makes me a misogynist, so be it."

Now, of course, Andrew Tate is brilliant at being the most provocative on whatever the topic is. So this again is more of that. He's very good at this communication thing, if you haven't noticed. But I'll give you my take. I also believe that women did not evolve for defense, protection, defense to be their top priority sort of biologically designed to do it. Men did. Men are designed for violence. We're designed to protect what we love and kill what we don't and kill what we need to eat. And so I just ask you this, male or female, let's say you've got a date, one of you is male, one of you is female. You go into a restaurant. Which one of you knows where the exits are? Which one of you plans just automatically, reflexively what would happen if an armed person came in and shooting in the restaurant? Like what would be the first thing you do? Men do that. We are designed, we're trained from birth, I think, to be defense-oriented.

So if you're talking about what should we do about the border of the country, you don't want women involved in that. If you do, you're going to get an open border because women are trained, designed, evolved to put empathy first. Now, before you call me a misogynist, let me be clear. I do think that a woman could be the president and the best protector of the border. You remember Hillary was pretty hard-ass about the border before, you know, before she lied and said she wasn't. So yeah, you could get Margaret Thatcher. I could probably name half a dozen women who would be perfectly strong on all the things, strong on crime, strong on the border. So it's not about individuals, right? It's about averages. And the average applies to voting, but it doesn't apply to any one person who wanted to be extraordinary at one job. So any job is fine if they're qualified for the job. But as soon as you go with averages, it's like all right, everybody vote, men and women, everybody vote. You're gonna get the male vote, which would protect you from violence, watered down by the av