Back to episode — Episode 2969 CWSA 09/25/25
Context —
your head day after day after day after day until you get mad at something or somebody. And what's the first thing you think of? Oh, gun. So it's not one-to-one. If you watch a movie about guns, you're going to go shoot something. It's not that. But if you have enough people and you just fill them with gun content, yes, absolutely, 100%. No doubt about it. Speaking as a hypnotist, the repetition…
← Previous segment →t's crooked, but I don't know exactly what the word for that would be. But there he goes.
Now, my question would be this. How many ex-leaders of major countries, and I'm talking about NATO countries, not small little countries, but how many of them do you think you could find an actual crime at least as bad as this one, which is accepting campaign funds from a dictator? Don't you feel like it's nearly all of them? I feel like the only thing that's different about Sarkozy is that maybe he got caught. Don't you think they've all done a little something something? Is it just me? I feel like if you tried, you could put every one of them in jail. So I don't know what the real story is there. Maybe it had more to do with somebody wanting him in jail than what it was he did.
Well, Scott Bessent out of the Treasury says that if Zohran Mamdani gets elected mayor in New York City, as you know, he's a commie, Mamdani, and Scott Bessent says that if New York City asks for a bailout because they have money problems from if they ask for a bailout from the federal government, they will not get it and they will be told to drop dead. So that's another reason to not vote for the communist, because there would be no reason throwing good money after bad. So the feds would say, well, you voted for him. You work it out. So it feels like a reasonable position. We'll see if they change their mind.
Well, as you know, nearly all schools are left-leaning, and Oklahoma just came up with a sort of a stopgap way to address the fact that the teachers unions and the schools are pretty much thoroughly left-leaning. And what they're going to do is establish Turning Point USA chapters in all state high schools, according to the Epoch Times. Joseph Lord is writing about this. So what do you think of that idea? Oklahoma is going to force, I mean they don't have to force it too hard because people want to do it, Turning Point in every single state high school. I like that. I like that better than trying to erase the left-leaning influence. Just put another influence in there.
And now if we do, all Americans are autistic when they do something dumb. Eric Erickson is saying that high school boys are calling each other Tylenol Americans instead of autists. They're cruel. They're cruel. It's funny though. Anyway, so Oklahoma, good experiment. We don't know if it'll work, but definitely worth a shot.
The College Fix is writing about a large study of syllabi in colleges. You know, the syllabi, that would be plural of syllabus. Yeah, the syllabi. So they looked at the syllabi, which is the list of what they're going to teach in the classes, and they found out that the college professors predominantly present left-wing perspectives on all the controversial stuff. So if it's anything from the Palestinian situation, abortion, racial bias, all those things, you get only the left-wing view. So do you think colleges need their own Turning Point USA? Yes, they do. Yes, they do.
Well, the first lady of Florida, Casey DeSantis, she's getting involved in looking into cancer studies, and she's looking into generic drugs or drugs that already exist and is going to find out if any of them have a purpose or a use in cancer. And she mentioned ivermectin as the one that's sort of at the top of the interest list.
Now, you know what I'm going to say, right? Well, as luck would have it, I have cancer, so I know a little bit more about this topic than those who don't have cancer, probably. Unless you're a doctor. Well, what do you think I'm going to say about ivermectin being a cure for cancer? You've heard me before.
All right. I'm a little surprised that this is still a question and that well-meaning, intelligent, educated people are still believing that there's a real good chance that ivermectin cures cancer. Here is what you would need, and I've said this before. This is what you would need to convince me that there's something to it. Now obviously a randomized controlled gold standard study would be great, but short of that I would settle for anybody who had an incurable cancer who cured it with ivermectin.
Now I know what you're going to say, but Scott, I heard about that guy. No you didn't. No you didn't. You did not hear about a guy who got cured of cancer with ivermectin. You believe he did, and there's a real person named with a real name and has a real life, and if you asked him he'd say, oh yeah, this ivermectin cured my cancer. But what you would need to convince me, and ideally it's what it would take to convince you as well, is you would need the patient with a story, you'd need the oncologist, not any other doctor, not some random doctor but the actual oncologist who treated them. You would have to see their medical records, and you would have to see in the medical records that they used no other treatment, nothing else. And then you can say, well, this was incurable. The doctor can confirm that this is the only thing that they did. You can look at the record. You see that they used to have terrible cancer. And look at this updated medical record. It's all clear now.
Well, you're never going to see that. Do you know why? If it were true that ivermectin worked, obviously the oncologists would know about it by now. Not everyone, but clearly there would be an oncologist who had a patient who said, oh my god, we may have discovered something amazing. So let's at least share it with the world and see if maybe somebody else is noticing this too. But there's not one, not one, not one oncologist with a patient with, and this is very important, you can't leave this out, with the medical record before and after. How hard would that be?
Now, I think a year and a half ago I told you I was working on a very big project. It didn't work out. The big project was I tried ivermectin, and if it had cured my cancer or even reduced it a little bit, I would have told everybody. I would have forced my oncologist to go public and say, look, you're coming with me. Yes you do. Yeah, you're coming with me. You're going to be on this. You're going to tell the world, you're going to show them my medical record, and you're going to confirm with me that this cured my cancer that was incurable.
Well, nothing like that happened. But I did get on testosterone blockers, which had a huge, just a gigantic impact on reducing my symptoms, etc. It's not a cure. But my guess is that the people who have claims that the ivermectin worked, they're either lying or they might have been on something else such as testosterone blockers and they're just not talking about it. So there's something going on.
But I will give you 100% odds that you can't just take nothing but ivermectin and cure your cancer. I will give 100% certainty of that. You would definitely know about it by now because every oncologist would want to go public with that if they'd even seen it once. Right now you will see some doctors say, yes, it cured all kinds of people. All of my patients, oh, so many of my patients are cured of it. They're all making money by selling you that advice. Find somebody who was going to make the same amount of money whether you got cured or not. That would be my oncologist. It's just a Kaiser oncologist. So he gets paid the same. If you can find s
Context —
omebody who gets paid the same no matter whether it works or not, and they say it works, well, I would listen to that. But don't listen to somebody who's made a career out of it. That just isn't credible by its nature. All right. Let me tell you what will happen as soon as I get back on X. There will be somebody who said, Scott, you idiot. I know of the one guy who cured. No. Listen to me. If all…
Next segment → →