like if demons were real. I don't know.

But then look at the others. Raskin. You telling me Raskin doesn't look evil or Schiff or Comey. I think Comey doesn't look as evil. Comey looks more like a weasel, you know, like you cannot like what he does but he doesn't look evil. He obviously looks like somebody who lied but that's not that unusual. I wouldn't say evil. But how about Brennan? Brennan comes off as evil. You can't possibly look at that guy and say, "Oh there's somebody who plays between the lines." He just looks like a demon. What about Blumenthal? Evil. What about Hakeem Jeffries? Hakeem Jeffries is the most evil looking face I've ever seen in my life. Now the things he says are more ordinary Democrat things but oh my god if you were going to cast a demon or a bad guy in a movie you would cast him pretty quickly. What about Clapper? There's something with Clapper. I don't know what it is. Right. And what about several of the Democrat lawyers? I won't name names but you know which ones I'm talking about. They've got several TV lawyers. Not all of them. Elie Honig is a perfectly reasonable guy but they've got several lawyers that just come off as evil. They don't even come off as just biased, just evil.

And I'm trying to think. So yeah, you know what I'm talking about. So here's what I'm trying to decide. You know you always have to check yourself for bias. Are there prominent Republicans who are always in the news who have a persona that comes off as like a demon? And I couldn't think of one. And I think of the people in the news, obviously Trump. You know Trump is just Trump. He doesn't have any demon vibes. What about, you know, Thune? Thune just looks like a regular guy. What about Tom Cotton? Regular guy. I mean I could go down the list but I'm not wrong, right? It just the demeanor, the face, the way they act. You know there are liars everywhere and there are biased people everywhere but the amount of people that are Democrat leaders who are actually evil is weird.

I saw somebody say John McCain. I might have given you John McCain if he were still around. I might have said somebody saying Steve Miller. Stephen Miller is a little bit of a hybrid. There was a time when I would have said, "Okay, you got me. Stephen Miller is a scary persona." But at the moment he's projecting extreme competence and doing exactly what most of the base wants him to do. So I believe he's managed his brand from wow you're kind of scary to you're still kind of scary but you're doing what we want you to do. You're doing this scariness that we demand of you. So I would say that I have a different impression of him than maybe five years ago.

Anyway, speaking of Hakeem Jeffries, he was just at a Black Caucus conference and he said that Republicans are pushing white supremacy, invoking Jim Crow, the KKK, and lynching. Now you're a real piece of if that's your message to black America. I mean what can you say about Hakeem Jeffries but pure piece of especially in the context of the rhetoric being too extreme and cause violence? What would cause, I mean this is just so damaging that this is beyond just a mistake. This is evil. This is just pure unadulterated evil. How does he get away with that?

Anyway, there's big news in the so-called Tina Peters case. I guess she's in court because she did some things with some voting machines trying to determine if there were some irregularities in the 2020 election and did something that got her in trouble. But the new news is that they have on her side, Emerald Robinson is posting on this, that apparently they have a witness who claims and the witness is from Venezuela. Remember the Kraken when Sidney Powell said there's a general in Venezuela and they can manipulate the voting machines, blah blah blah. And then that turned out not, it got debunked. I don't know if it was untrue but it got debunked. Well now there's a Venezuelan witness. We don't know much about him because he's afraid for his life. So he is operating anonymously from us. And he alleges that the voting machines, I'll give you the question and the answer. The question was, sir do you have personal knowledge, personal knowledge right so it's got to be personal knowledge, whether the election systems in the US, the voting systems, can be manipulated by foreign agents. The answer was the electoral systems of the United States can be manipulated by foreign agents or third parties.

Do you think that testimony is going to hold? I'm going to say no. I'm going to say no. I would vote against this holding up as a fact. It could be that this is just another Kraken, you know, another intentionally fake story to make it even harder to know what really is true. So while I don't trust voting machines as a general statement and I don't believe that they should be part of our system because we can't trust them. There's no way you could know. But is this one witness telling the truth? And does this person know the truth? I'd bet against it. Yeah, I'd bet against it. But maybe I could be wrong about that but I'd bet against it. And the bet against it is only based on the fact that there have been about a billion election claims and they always turn stale. They never really pan out. So if this is the real one, well I just don't want to do the Charlie Brown football thing where I keep going, hey, I think this was real. Finally. Finally we got a real one. Maybe, but I'm not going to embrace that. I would need more.

John Solomon of Just the News is reporting that we've just learned that the FBI had 274 agents at the Capitol on January 6. And allegedly they were plainclothes. They didn't have a way to identify themselves even to each other. And I guess they thought they were ill-prepared and ill-managed in what they were supposed to do when they were there. But 274 and that would just be the FBI. How many other entities would have had undercover people there? What do you think? And would 274 agents, would that be enough to cause the crowd to go a certain direction that maybe it wouldn't have? The answer is yes. That is enough people that if those people wanted to make sure there was trouble they could very easily with that number of people. I mean even much less. It would probably only take a dozen people to initiate something like knocking on a window or something like that but 274 it becomes easy. You could absolutely manage the