m. I mean, look at my face. I'm smug. Why don't they understand that if they just all gave their weapons away, there would be no violence? And look how smart I am. Can you tell how smart I am by my smug smile?

Now, that's my reframe. The reframe is that the far left are nothing but just nothing but Dunning-Kruger sufferers. Nothing but. Now, are there also some Dunning-Kruger people on the right? Of course. Of course. It's not limited to one side. But the entire far left, every one of them believes they know more than they know. Oh, I took this course in college that said that socialism was good, so Mamdani must be a good choice. And they would feel confident in that. Not just confident, but they'd be sure that you're wrong. Oh. Are you still sticking to that capitalism idea? I can barely contain my smile at your stupidity when socialism is obviously the best solution that's worked every time it's been tried as far as I know. Yeah. It's that stupid damn smug smile that gives it away. And then on top of that, there's a bunch of people who are just in it for power and whatever. And that's different. The ones who are just in it for the power, you know, the Nancy Pelosis, etc., that's completely different. But the ordinary voters, yeah, that's Dunning-Kruger. Total Dunning-Kruger.

Wall Street Apes is reporting on X that there's a gentleman named David Khait who has exposed some Democrat protesters. And did you know there's a union? Apparently, there's an appropriate union so that some of the protesters are getting union pay. They join the union and then they accept the assignment and they get union pay. So apparently they can make 80 to 110,000 per year as professional protesters. And so a lot of the protesters you see they don't care. They're not there because they care about the issue. It rhymes with what? Somebody was telling me what it was, so I missed it. And then one of them that this David Khait exposed he apparently is a prominent member with the Democrat Socialists of America Atlanta chapter and I guess there's a lot of them who do this kind of work. So never trust the protests. They're just paid protesters now. We know it. We know the whole structure of it, etc. And so he's backing Mamdani. So if a paid protester backs Mamdani, do you think that he actually backs him? It looks like he might because they're both socialists, but I wouldn't trust the paid protesters.

Oops. So in other news, Corey DeAngelis, who's a very successful activist for school choice, he came into possession of a leaked email from I guess it was the assistant to Randi Weingarten. So Randi Weingarten is the head of the biggest teachers union and they're very political and I don't believe that the Democrats could win anything without them, the teachers union funding and being on their side. Apparently the assistant wrote an email that was warning people about backing Mamdani and he said that Mamdani has no experience in city government. And he points as an analog the mayor of Chicago is at a 14% favorability rating. I've never even heard of that. Have you even heard of anybody at 14% approval politician? I've never even heard it. I feel like Hitler was higher than that. And he points out the assistant to Randi Weingarten, he points out that winning an election does not necessarily translate into the ability to govern. And then it gets better. He says it is important to face squarely what has happened in Chicago. It has not gone well. But here's the kill shot. But something has clearly gone wrong and it can't just be attributed to our enemies.

There it is. There it is. Don't you wonder? And haven't you wondered if, let's say, the teachers union, do they not recognize that they're backing the worst people in the world like Mamdani? Do they not know it? Are they actually clueless? And the answer is no. They know it. They know it and they're doing it anyway. They know it and they're doing it anyway. Why? Power. What would be the other reason you would back horrible candidates? Well, some might say if they were running against Trump, you could always say, well, anything's better than Trump in my opinion. But that's not true for every politician everywhere all the time, mayors included. Now, apparently Democrats know that the Chicago mayor is a disaster and that Mamdani will be another disaster. Do you think that the fact that the assistant to Weingarten knows that? And I'm pretty sure that the rest of the people know it, too. Do you think that will change who they back? I'm going to say no. Nope. Even being caught understanding that he would be a disaster even with that. Nope. Nope. The power predictor says they'll just keep doing what they're doing. So Democrats are not serious. They're not trying to make the country better. Let's not kid ourselves. They're not in it for that.

Well, there's a Somali woman who lives in Minnesota was charged for stealing, you know, fraudulently doing a scheme on an autism site where she stole $14 million by pretending to treat children who in most cases probably didn't have autism. So she apparently she was doing a $1,000 per child kickback to parents who would be willing to pretend that their children were autistic and enroll them. Oh my god. What happens to the child who gets enrolled in the you're autistic school so that the parents can make $1,000 and then they're trained as though they're autistic? What does that do to your education path? It feels like that would limit you a little bit, wouldn't it? So this might be one of the worst crimes you'll ever hear of in your whole life. If it's as bad as it sounds to me. And the question is, do you think this is rare? Do you think there's only one of these people who said, huh, all I have to do is pretend I'm treating autistic people and I can make millions of dollars? Do you think just the one woman had an idea like that? No. I think there are tons of them. It could be that the entire run-up of costs on healthcare, it might be that 100% of it is crime. It might be. I mean, I wouldn't bet on 100% of it being crime, but it could be. It's that size. You know, we're probably talking about hundreds of billions a year in pure crime. You know, not even a gray area, just pure theft, probably hundreds of billions a year.

All right. The feds have indicted three women who were involved with tracking down some ICE agents and following them home and doxing their home address on Instagram so that people could harass them or bother them. And a federal grand jury has indicted them. Now, they're just indicted. They're not convicted. But here's my question. The women who were doing that were doing it publicly. So they weren't trying to hide. Did they believe that because they were young women, they just don't get arrested? Like at what point would they not know that they were breaking a law and that it was obvious it was them and they would be on social media and did they not think that the law applied to them? I'm feeling like that might be some of our problem that women don't see themselves as ever going to jail. As a man, I imagine myself in jail, unfortunately, far too often and far too easily. How hard is it for a man to imagine that something would go wrong, whether you actually did something illegal or not, and you would end up in jail? It to me. You know, your mileage might differ, but even though I go out of my way not to break a law, you know, I try as hard as I can not to break any laws because I don't need to. Like, why would I need to? I don't have any there's no gain. So but yet I still have a perpetual never goes away. I can be thrown in jail for what? I don't know. Somebody would come up with something. But I don't think tha