ention.

Do you know that in order for a genocide to be a genocide you have to have the intention of removing or killing all the people? So removing the people is a genocide too, just moving them from wherever they are to somewhere else. So you don't have to kill them all but removing them would be a genocide, but you would have to have the intention of a genocide according to the ADL, the leader Jonathan Greenblatt.

Now is that just a weasel way to get out of dealing with a question or do you find that valid? Well you know Israel has never said our intention is to do a genocide or our intention, but they have said, correct me if I'm wrong, we'll talk about the Gaza 21-point plan in a moment, but haven't they said directly we're going to move all the people out, you know maybe with some ability for some of them to move back in the future, but is that enough? Is that enough if you say well yeah we're just going to clean up some problems with Hamas and then people can come back in? So is that enough to say that you don't have the intention of moving people out and keeping them out? I don't know. Feels like it's a little hard to navigate that situation if you're the ADL.

But as it stands, the 65,000 people who have been killed and the millions who are being dislocated in Gaza is not a situation of hate and extremism. But that damn Charlie Kirk and all those Christians who are worshiping God and trying to live a holy life, they're a case of hate and extremism. So I don't know how long the ADL is going to last because it just makes Jewish people look like... Honestly if I were a Jew I would want the ADL to go away right away as soon as possible. I would not want that to be part of what my reputational brand is for God's sakes. Anyway, maybe the ADL should label itself a hate group and that would take care of everything.

According to Fox News there's an NPR Ipsos poll that says 71% of those polled say that crime levels in American cities are unacceptable. It makes you wonder how would somebody answer that question any other way? Well if she said is the crime level in Chicago acceptable? Apparently there's somebody who says yes. Quite a few people. At what point is the crime level acceptable? I would say the acceptable level would be zero. Acceptable. I mean you wouldn't, if your crime was let's say relatively low, you wouldn't get rid of the police department, right? You would say well you know now that we got the crime down to one murder per whatever we don't need a police. I mean it's acceptable. It's just acceptable now. So I feel like it's a dumb question. So I'd ignore that one.

Well I gu