Back to episode — Episode 2975 CWSA 10/01/25
Context —
re the odds that Russia is going to pay reparations to Ukraine? Is this just the EU being stupid because they don't want to say we're just giving away our money. So they're going to act like well there's one possibility some of it might come back. Who believes that? Nobody. All right. Also in Ukraine, according to Visegrad 24, there's a major UK not Ukraine, but in Russia, there's a major oil ref…
← Previous segment →your way. Maybe all kinds of CIA dirty tricks to weaken things and change the narrative, etc.
Do you think that they could pull that off without any weapons being fired? Well, the answer is, according to Democrats, yes. It turns out that you can overthrow a country just by wandering around without weapons in one of the buildings you're not supposed to be in. Now, we all learned that, right? In January 6, we learned that a proper insurrection really is just trespassing in one building with no weapons. So maybe that's what the CIA is doing. It's like, "Hey guys, if you really want to run an insurrection, look at the way we did it in America. We get some unarmed people to wander around and take selfies in a building where they're not allowed to be in. Do you hear me? This could work. Wouldn't it be better if you supported us with your intense gigantic military that's right outside our door? Don't need to. Don't need to. All you need to do is trespass without weapons because we know the Democrats have taught us that is how you overtake a country. The military won't even act. You think the Venezuelan military is going to come in and try to remove you? No. No, they won't."
Anyway, apparently 70% of the population allegedly voted for somebody who's not Maduro, somebody named Gonzalez. And so they would try to get people to accept Gonzalez as already the leader and go from there.
New York University did a study of 5 to 11 year olds in the US and China and found out that children's belief that their family and friends would support their pursuit of political leadership as adults predicted their expressed motivation to become political leaders, specifically president or chairman if you're in China. So the idea was that the reason more males than females become presidents and leaders is because they learn very early between 5 and 11 that their parents would support a boy trying to become president, but they would not support a girl trying to become president. Do you believe that? Or are you watching the cats behind my shoulder seemingly having some kind of sexual encounter, but pretty sure it's not. I'm about 80% sure that's not sexual. Yeah.
Anyway, do you believe that that's why girls don't become leaders as ofte
Context —
n because their parents did not support them when they were between five and 11? I don't believe that. Here's what I believe. When I was between the ages of five and 11, I wanted to be rich and famous and somehow impactful in the world. But my father's advice was to work for the post office. True story. He worked for the post office and he couldn't stop raving about how good the benefits were. Get…
Next segment → →