It was like a whole long episode. I watched every minute of it, which I almost never do. I don't watch usually the whole episode of anything, but so I'm grateful that you do, but I usually can't hang. But oh my god, is she talented. If any of you had the same reaction, her voice is just perfect. Her mastery of her topic, impressive. The ability to find an angle on something or a point of view that you haven't seen everywhere else. Amazing. The fluency with which she communicates. Oh my god. So smart. So smart. So talented. I watched that show and sat there thinking I need to get out of this business because I'm nowhere near that, right? I say great things about Megyn Kelly and of course Joe Rogan's a legend and you can name a bunch of others. Tucker is amazing. You know, just talent wise, you don't have to agree with everything they say. Just talent-wise, but she might be the best of all. She might be the best in the entire business. She might be the best. And one of the ways I judge that is if every minute is interesting, and it actually is.

Now let me say clearly, I do not believe Brigitte Macron has a penis. I don't believe that at all. But when you see how well she supports that theory, that is entertaining. All right? If you're not entertained by that, I don't know what it takes to entertain you, but that's entertaining. Now when she suggests but does not say that she's sort of open to the possibility that some foreign entity was involved in the Charlie Kirk murder. And she doesn't have to say it, but we all know based on the context that she's thinking that maybe Israel had some involvement in that because Charlie had turned against Israel at the end. And that would be a pretty big risk for Israel because he would be important enough that if they lost him, that could be very expensive for Israel. So she did demonstrate that they have a motive. I didn't expect that. She actually successfully demonstrated that Israel had a motive to kill him, which is not funny, but I'm just sort of like so impressed how well she can bring things together that I don't believe, but still quite expertly sort of teased.

So and I told you yesterday, I don't believe there's any chance that Israel was involved because they're way too smart. Netanyahu especially way too smart to do something that if there was even a 1% chance you get caught that would be the end of the game. That would be a dumb risk management versus just trying to deal with him and bring him back to a positive opinion. Much more doable much less risk than trying to off him. You know even if you thought you could hide your tracks no that's too risky. So I don't believe it at all.

And the one thing you should keep in mind when you watch any of the top influencers when they've got a point of view that is not common and it's not held by other people. Two things I want to teach you about persuasion that I've mentioned before, but every time you hear them in context and applied to a real world thing, they get a little stronger in your mind. Number one, the documentary effect, which I mention all the time. The documentary effect means that if you're listening to one point of view for an hour, you're going to kind of come away thinking it's true because you listen to one point of view for an hour. It has nothing to do with how true it is. It will just seem more and more true the longer you watch. That's just what the documentary does. So Candace is sort of an example. It's not a documentary, but you know what I mean. It's one point of view for an extended period. So yes, that's going to be very persuasive coming from, in my opinion, maybe one of the best communicators who's ever been alive. I mean, she's really good.

The other example is the other thing you need to know is the Bible code. Again, I've mentioned it, but every time you see an example of it, it reinforces it. The Bible code was years ago, it might have been the 60s or 70s, I forget. Somebody wrote a book called the Bible Code in which they found that you could determine that the Bible, you know, the regular King James Bible, had a bunch of hidden codes in it that could have only come from God. And they gave all kinds of examples. They said, "All right, and I'll make up this example, but it's stuff like if you took the first word of the page and then the second word of the second sentence, but the third word of the third sentence, they would form a prediction, which you can see in history actually came true." It'd be like big bomb 1949, whatever it is. And then you say, "Yes, it was forecasting the nuclear bomb." And the trouble was that although those codes did in fact exist, you could go look for yourself. They would say, "All right, yeah, well, sure enough, third word, second word on the next page." You know, if you follow this algorithm, it does make a sentence and it does predict because you can see for yourself that it happened. Do you know how the Bible code was debunked? Somebody took their algorithm and applied it to War and Peace and it also made a lot of predictions that came true. In other words, you can take any big body of anything that's complicated. Could be a book, could be a story, could be a real world event, and you can always find what looks like circumstantial evidence to any thing you want. Do you want me to prove that aliens were complicit in killing somebody? I could probably do it. I could find all kinds of well, did you know that there was a report of an alien in the area that day? Did you know that there were reports of aliens in other places where people were murdered? I mean, it would look like that. So pretty soon I could build this story of all this circumstantial evidence that would be so compelling to you that you would really think the aliens were involved.

So when you watch Candace, remember the documentary effect means that it will be convincing because it's long and because she's really really good at this, like really good. And secondly, if you say, "But Scott, the evidence is real." Like you could check it yourself. There's the text message, you know, all that. And I would say, "Yep. Yep. The Bible code guarantees that any complex situation will have multiple hypotheses that all seem to have evidence." That's the whole point of a court case. Do you know that the defense in a court case is going to have a version of events with a whole bunch of circumstantial evidence to show the person is innocent. The prosecution will have a whole bunch of stories of circumstantial evidence that says they're guilty. So in every case you can make the case and the opposite case if it's a complicated situation something like a book and the Charlie situation is complicated enough that that's possible.

Anyway, if you haven't watched Candace's show, I recommend it. It's tremendous. But be careful. All right.

There was this meeting that Trump was at to I guess talk about looking into the sources of Antifa funding and I had a bunch of independent journalists who were there. Some of them had had run-ins with Antifa I guess and one of them Brandy Cruz said quote I'm living proof that you can recover from TDS. So she said this in front of the room and in front of Trump. She said, "I think I even got a little more attractive after I got rid of my Trump derangement syndrome." Boy, talk about saying something that is going to amuse Trump. Trump couldn't get the smile off his face. I think he agreed with her that she became more attractive.

Anyway, so if I had to give some advice to Brandy, who went from an anti-Trumper TDS person to a oh maybe I was wrong about all that. Maybe Trump is the way. If I had to give her some advice, you know what I'd say? You know, all of her old friends, the Democrats she was hanging around with, what do you think they're going to think of her now that she's come out as a MAGA supporting person? Do you think all of her friends are going to be okay with her? You think they'll invite her to parties