on and this might not be the winning position because I don't know that there's enough to convict but he took the strong position and what you'll remember about Trump when all the fog clears is that he was the strongest leader. You won't remember that maybe that court case didn't work out. You'll just remember he always took the strong side and it was the strong side on behalf of America. You don't forget the person who always takes your side even stronger than you do. You don't forget that person.

Anyway, I guess the White House released the names of people, rich people funding Antifa. Who do you think it was? If you guessed it was a network of NGOs, you'd be right. If you guessed that hundreds of millions of taxpayer money somehow got funneled through NGOs that got funneled into Antifa, meaning that your taxpayers, that your tax money is paying the people trying to kill you. Well, trying to destroy your system, which would end up in a lot of us dying. You'd be right. But also, if you guessed George Soros, you'd be right. If you guessed Arabella Funding Network, you may have heard some of these names before. The Tides Foundation Network. They were involved. They funded allegedly. Neville Roy Singham. I don't know who he is, but he's got a network. And then there's this Swiss billionaire guy who's like a hundred years old, Johan George Hanser. For some reason there's some Swiss billionaire who cares deeply about destroying America by funding all the wrong people. What's up with that guy? Yeah, I don't see how we let foreigners do that. But then there's a bunch of additional foreign cash and other stuff. So I am impressed that the Trump administration is going after the funding but also finding it. So if you imagine that Antifa is not a real organization, who's getting the money? If it's not a real organization, who are they funding? What is there to fund? There's no organization there, right? But apparently there is an organization and they're taking in a lot of money.

Well, here's a story that could be gigantic, but I never even heard about it until yesterday. I saw a post by Eric Daugherty. Good follow, by the way. If you want to get independent journalist kind of stuff. Eric Daugherty, spelled D A U G H E R T Y, spelled like daughter with a Y on the end. So it turns out that the Supreme Court is going to vote on abolishing a specific part of the Voting Rights Act that allowed special districts to be allocated for black voters. Well, they say for minorities, but I suspect the majority of that was for the benefit of the black community. But did you even know this? I didn't know this was a thing that there were districts that were drawn for minorities to favor Democrats. So I guess the idea was to make sure that minorities did not get closed out of having representation by a bunch of white people redistricting because you could redistrict to cut up the black neighborhoods so that they would never be able to elect a black leader because there just wouldn't be enough black people in any one voting area. So it looks like in order to protect against discrimination in redistricting, the law allowed them to redistrict for the purpose of making sure that black voters, I think mostly black, had representation.

Now like most things, that sounds like kind of a good idea, right? If you have a real problem with black representation being eliminated intentionally by redistricting, yeah, I think I would have been in favor of this actually, you know, if you took me back in time. But it is time to reassess because I don't know that Republicans would do that in 2025, especially if it's really obvious. You know, the other way to handle it is not to make it illegal, but make it public and say, "Look, look what these dirty Republicans did. We Democrats would never do something that bad to you." So I feel like this might be exactly the right time to overturn it. And not because it didn't have a purpose. I would say the same thing with all of the racial improvements that have been made over time. There's a time to do it when you need the tourniquet. Like things are just so bad. You got to eliminate slavery. Like you just got to do that. You got to eliminate Jim Crow. You got to make sure that black people have a seat at the table and that they can get interviewed like everybody else and if they've got the skills they can get the job. All that's great in its time. So the only question is not whether those were good ideas but whether they currently match the time. And I don't think that they currently match the time. I think we have other better ways to handle that sort of thing. But we'll see. There's a good chance that that will happen and that would result in 19 more Republican House seats potentially. I think they'd still have to redistrict to get it, but imagine getting 19 more Republican seats in the House before the midterms. That would pretty much guarantee the Republicans keep the House. So I can't believe I didn't know about that story before.

I saw a suggestion by a user on X, nobody famous, that I thought was so good. It's one of those examples where maybe the magic of social media could work. So I have a largestish account on X, which means a lot of people will see what I post, but I also read and consume a lot of smaller accounts. Usually they're commenting, right? I'll see them in my comments. So that creates a system where I can see an individual who's not famous or noted for anything. They can talk to me then people will see me because I'm more public and 1.3 million people I can guarantee that important people in the administration not all of them but important people will see my show or see my X posts and then if the idea is so good that the individual gets to me I'm impressed I post it goes to somebody maybe on the way have a staff. They're impressed. Next thing you know, something happens. Now this might be one of those.

So let me tell you the situation. The suggestion is from a user on X named Misty Sunrise. Again, don't know anything about the person. It's just a user on X. Misty Sunrise had this suggestion talking about Trump surging the forces into the cities for crime. Misty said they need to frame these as quote gun violence reduction missions. You feel it already? And she goes on or he goes on, I don't know who Misty is, but white female voters love to virtue signal on the gun violence issue. So connecting the National Guard deployments to the zip codes with the highes