for the life of me tell if it was a new story. It looks like just the old story that maybe something got added to. So according to Jesse Watters and others, there's some new documents that got found about Obama's involvement in the Steele dossier and the Russia collusion hoax. And that these new documents confirm for sure that Obama was the one behind the weaponization of the intelligence and the effort to remove Trump even after he got elected. After he got elected. So but I didn't know what was new in the story because I thought we already knew that Obama's the one who ordered the intel about Trump and Russia to be redone to make it look like it was worse than it was. Didn't we already know that? But I guess there's some new document that really confirms that now. Yeah.

So we know that Brennan lied about the use of the Steele dossier as one of the predicates, if that's the right word, for going after Trump. So we know that was fake. We do know that the professionals working on the assessment didn't think there was evidence of either that Putin wanted Trump or that he was doing anything to make it happen. So but do we have something new?

And then I saw a reference to something that I didn't see in the news. I only saw in social media and it said that the ex head of the FBI, Ray? Give me a fact check on this. I'm very uncertain about this, but did he refer to Biden as a vegetable and said that they needed something to support the vegetable? Did that happen or was that just a social media BS thing? All right. So give me a fact check on that, will you?

All right. So if that's true, it got completely lost by the bigger news from the Middle East. But do we now have everything that we need to know that Obama tried to overthrow the fairly elected president of the United States and that all of their projection on Trump was very intentional projection to blame him for what they were doing to him at that very moment which apparently is a good trick that they use a lot.

So pet the kitty. Yeah.

All right. So Michael Cohen, the ex fixer lawyer guy for Trump who even went to jail and is no friend of Trump's. He says to the MSNBC panel, he said this a few times, but he said it again, that Letitia James and James Comey will be held accountable, meaning that he thinks they'll be convicted. Do you believe that? Do you think that Letitia James and James Comey will be held accountable or just tried and slapping the wrist or suspended sentence or nothing? I don't think they'll be held accountable. I don't think they'll be held accountable at all.

But Cohen's argument is that the documents will speak for themselves. Now, that's not true. What kind of lawyer is he? In what world do documents ever speak for themselves? That's not even a thing. Documents don't speak for themselves. If the only thing that we had to go on was the documents, yeah, Letitia James looks guilty as hell, but that's not what a court case is about. A court case adds all the context. Suppose the context showed she didn't know she did it. I'm not saying that's the case. Suppose the context showed that her let's say she had a business manager or an accountant who just told her to do it and she didn't really look at it. That's sort of a defense. If your professional did it and you trusted the professional, that's actually a defense. But that context all matters. So I don't for a minute believe that the documents make the case. I just don't think that works in general much less in this case. And I don't think that that does that even apply to Comey. Are there documents that would put Comey in or you need more than that for Comey? Right.

So I don't know how good a lawyer Michael Cohen is, but I'm going to put my total non-lawyer experience up against his and say I'm not so sure. I guess just the process will be bad enough for the people going through it.

Here are some interesting things from around the world. So the former Intel CEO says we're in an AI bubble, which we all k