e living spaces so you'd have jobs but you wouldn't have to commute that much. And they'd fix the transportation so it's easy to get from one place to the other. They would fix the building architecture so that it looked good. There's no reason it can't look good and be the most livable places and affordable that you could have.

What is it that you say when I say people are looking at new living styles? You irrationally say, "You can't let make me live in any tiny house." Did I mention a tiny house? No, this is not about tiny houses. But what will be your objection to these well-designed cities? Your objection will be, "I'm not going to live in a tiny house." No. Let me tell you again. There's no tiny houses. This has nothing to do with tiny houses. I know you won't live in a tiny house. I got it. You don't want to live in a 15-minute city. I got it. No, this would be designed by the people who would want to have a better lifestyle. It's not being designed by the people who want to control you. Or is it? I don't think so. I think that this would be a safe group of entrepreneurs. That's my guess.

Joe Rogan had a climate skeptic on, a famous one, Richard Lindzen. You know him. He's retired now but he was a PhD professor emeritus of all earth science kind of climate stuff so he's an expert on climate at one of the biggest schools, MIT. So here's what he said. Now maybe I'd heard this before but he said quote on the one hand you're told the science is settled. We're talking about climate change. But on the other hand if you read the IPCC reports they're pointing out for instance that listen to this. Water vapor and clouds are much big