Back to episode — Episode 2996 CWSA 10/22/25
Context —
. Protesting is in my blood. A lot of them talk like that. Yeah, my parents were protesters. I've been protesting since I was six years old. So some of it's just that, you know, the one bucket list item, let's do our final tour while we can still walk kind of thing. Some of them are probably paid. The organizers paid. I think some of the attendees are paid. So some of it might be money. Some of it…
← Previous segment →him of sexual assault claims. No, nothing like that ever happened. They've accused him of being a white nationalist. Nope. Nope. Nothing like that. They said he was friends with some famous racist Richard Spencer. Nope. None of it true. So he's suing them now. He already won. Who did he beat? He already beat one AI that was doing that. They settled with him. He's going to win this one too. So I don't know if we'll ever find out what the settlement is, but getting defamed looks like a pretty good business model at the moment.
So Karine Jean-Pierre, Biden's old spokesperson, she's back with her new book called Independence. And so she's making the rounds. Well, that's funny. All right, I'm seeing a funny comment. I'll get back to that. Have you noticed though, if you saw Karine Jean-Pierre, that she's changed her hairstyle. So instead of having the afro that she had, she's gone to a whole different look with I guess she uncurled her hair, flattened her hair, and she looks like a totally different person. I don't like it. One of the things I liked best about her when she was Biden's spokesperson is that she didn't look or dress like other people. I thought she did a great job. I loved her old look. I know a lot of you didn't, right? We can disagree on that, but I loved it. I always thought, God, that's such a bold like such a classy, bold, professional, and yet stylistic approach. I always thought it was great. I loved her look, but she went a different direction and a lot of her charisma just disappears as soon as she changes to a like just an ordinary. She now just looks like somebody's mom. And she loses a lot.
Anyway, they're pestering her about how much she knew about Biden's decline. She of course is going to deny. She's denying that she noticed there was anything wrong with him. He certainly had signs of aging, she admits, but there did not seem to be any signs that he couldn't do his professional job, says her. Some people think that she would only say that because her only way she could ever get another job is with the Biden's approval. So apparently the Bidens might have enough sway over the world that if she wants to have a good job in her future, she's going to have to say good things about Biden so that Biden can put in the good word for her and maybe get her something. Now that's just somebody's hypothesis. It could be that this is just exactly what she saw and felt. Might have been because cognitive dissonance would get her to the point where she couldn't see his disabilities. It doesn't have to be that she's lying or stupid. It could be just cognitive dissonance. She knew that if she acknowledged his disabilities that her life would be ruined and her career would be ruined. So her brain just talked her out of it. That would be the normal way cognitive dissonance works. So it could be just a phenomenon and not any kind of organic fault in her.
Did you know that the Trump government has 40 people involved across the government in some kind of a, what is it called? They're trying to fight against the lawfare against Trump. Well, weaponization of the government. So it's 40 people, pretty high-powered people too I think, that are fighting the weaponization of government in different departments I think but they're working together. And they're looking for retribution for January 6 and the Trump prosecutions and the Russia probe, and I am all for that. 40 people, that sounds like a serious effort, and it has to be done. There has to be an answer for what has been done. So good. See interagency weaponization working group. Go nuts guys.
Well, Laura Loomer, controversial right-leaning pundit. Apparently she's having some security problems. There's an anti-Israel guy who's made credible threats and she has to beef up her security, but also I guess he's made threats to also the CEO of the satirical site that we all like, the conservative satirical site. As soon as you say it I'll go, "Oh, you know what I'm talking about, right?" Anyway, so this the same nut job has threatened a few people and I guess law enforcement is taking it seriously. Loomer is being accused of being a Mossad spy. I don't think that's the case. The Daily Mail is reporting on this. I don't think it's the case, but it is a terrible situation that Trump supporters, the prominent ones, are worried for their life. Apparently a lot of the high, the Babylon Bee, thank you, the Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon is one of the ones being threatened. So I hope that all of them are okay because some of them are going to spend a ton of money. I think Ben Shapiro probably spends a ton of money and probably there are half a dozen others that just absolutely have to have security now or they feel they do.
Now the beauty of me being in my current situation which is you know my lifespan is not that long. I don't feel the need for security. I was telling the local subscribers before I started this podcast. I was telling you if somebody like broke into my house and threatened to kill me, I'm at the point where I'd be like, "All right, just make it a good shot." Right there. Can we get this over with right there? So at the moment I don't need security. I'd probably have a good conversation with the killer before he did his thing.
Bill Ackman, investor Bill Ackman has some thoughts on Curtis Sliwa who's running for mayor in New York City and a lot of people want him to drop out because that would give at least some chance that somebody who's not a communist would win. Meaning Cuomo. Now if you're just watching and you don't know much about what's happening behind the curtain you would say to yourself, "Ah, what's wrong with that Sliwa? He's got to give us a chance not to get a communist." But Bill Ackman has some inside information. He says that apparently New York City has an 8:1 matching funds program for New York City donors which allows Sliwa because he's an official candidate for office to get $5 million of matching funds for his campaign from the city. So here's a guy who is not rich who by running for office and not dropping out he gets $5 million sloshing around to hire. So I wonder who he would hire. Well according to Bill Ackman he hired his wife and his friends and they're enjoying a better lifestyle than they have enjoyed before presumably because I imagine he didn't hire them for cheap and it's not even his money. It's public money.
So would you expect Curtis Sliwa to drop out if it meant that his family would make a lot less money and he could defend not dropping out even if he hated it. He could defend it. I don't think if this is true, and I'd have to hear Sliwa's response to it. So we don't have the response yet, but if it's true there's not really any chance he's going to drop out. Would you agree? If he can pay his wife another high salary for another x number of months and there may never be another chance like this to get sort of free money. You don't think he's going to stay in? I say follow the money. Now it might create a situation where somebody's going to make him some illegal offer to drop out. Pretty sure that wo
Context —
uld be illegal. I think he claimed that somebody offered him $10 million to drop out but I don't know about that. James O'Keefe has another win for his undercover work. He exposed a hundred billion dollar federal contracting scam where minority-owned businesses would get contracts because they could get them because they're minority owned but then they would just farm out the work to other entiti…
Next segment → →