hings is that we have ID for voting. Boom.

So these might be the same issue once you get rid of the filibuster. Likewise, there's a big decision coming up in the courts. The Supreme Court in this case will be listening next week to arguments about whether Trump can impose tariffs. Did you know that that was even a legal question, whether the president even has the authority to put tariffs on stuff? I kind of thought we sort of had agreed that that was okay, that at least he had the authority whether you liked it or not.

But the Trump argument is a quote that denial of tariff authority would expose our nation to trade retaliation without effective defenses. That is correct. May I add something to the Supreme Court argument because I'm pretty sure that all the lawyers who argue in the Supreme Court watch this podcast or should if you were a lawyer who argues things in the higher courts, you don't think you'd want to watch my show? I literally teach people how to persuade. Of course, not all of them. Yeah, I'm joking. They're not all watching the show, but you'd be surprised how many lawyers whose job it is to persuade contact me and tell me how useful it's been. They either read my book Win Bigly or they watch the podcast.

So is it crazy to assume that I could say something on my podcast that would be useful to this? It's not crazy because I'm going to do it right now. You ready for this reframe coming in? And it's a ref