didn't do it. You better hope he's getting advice, you know, because the advice can be separated from the person. But if he's doing this himself, okay, he's got game like you didn't know. So find out if he has an advisor and then find out secondly if his advisor came up with both of those things, only one of them or none. So we need to know that. Once you find the person who came up with those two things, if it's the same person, that person has a lot of power by being good at what they're doing. Not power by office, but power by influence. That would be a really influential person. You can ask. Please do. Please ask. All right. We'll find out.

Trump is drafting some executive orders on election integrity according to the Epoch Times. Tom O’Meara is writing about this. Now I thought that that was sort of a dead end. I thought that the states have so much guaranteed authority over elections that it wouldn't even matter what Trump did. They would just take it to court and say, "Get out of here." You know, states get to decide how to do this. But given that Trump is going forward with it, that would suggest there's something, you know, at least some optimism that he can get something done. But he is also calling the California mail-in voting system rigged, of course, and says it needs an illegal and criminal review.

So remember, I always tell you that one of the things that you can predict about Trump, and you'll see it again. Reality. You don't have a good view of reality unless you can predict. I always tell you that, right? So you tell me, could I have predicted that in the domain of election integrity, would it have been possible to predict that Trump would take the strongest stance? No. I've been telling you this forever. He always just takes the strongest stance. That's it. What's the strongest stance? Okay, that's my stance. Now, the fact that the strongest stance in this case, I don't think would work. Is that bad? Do we say, "Oh,