Back to episode — Episode 3013 CWSA 11/09/25
Context —
Democrats have an offer. There's something to respond to. And people told me, "Scott, the reason you can't say yes," and see if you agree with this. Okay, this is the part where I'm going to catch you. So put on your smartest thinking cap and see where this is going. So people told me, Scott, if you let this run for another year and you agree to an extension to essentially the current system, the…
← Previous segment →a Republican from ever winning again. Well, in 2028, let's say, don't you think that would be enough to just totally kill the Republican chances?
So the real question would be, could that be fixed? Is there any way at all and I'm wondering if there's some clever totally out of the box way to approach food costs. So here's the minimum it would have to do. The minimum it would have to do is keep the current system intact. So whatever it is would have to be not the government paying for it and yeah not the government that's the main thing not the government paying for it and it would have to be just a separate system.
So let me give you an example. Suppose somebody started a store for the poor and it only had four items. Had some chicken protein, some vegetables that might even come from some place where the vegetables were suboptimal. So they're not suboptimal, but let's say cut in different shapes. So maybe it'd make some soup or whatever. So yeah. So I think if you tried to build a grocery store that only had when you were done 20 items that then nobody would starve because they'd always have 20 items and it wouldn't be the only place they could get food. You know, they could also just use their social security or some of it to buy regular food. So everybody would still have everything they have now, but those people who really wanted to save money and they really were on a diet could go get their chicken thing that's totally healthy. And the government just make sure that somebody sells it to you. No. All right. Just running that idea by you.
Did you see the story I talked about that investigative reporter Steve Baker believes that he's seen some gait analysis? That's how people walk. Their gait. G-A-I-T. And that the software identified one particular person who I'm going to take the advice of someone I saw online who said don't use the name. That's sort of where
Context —
I'm at on this. I'm sort of at I don't think I want to use a name on this one because remember what I said if you don't see a video you have to suspend credibility basically you know it doesn't mean it's false but it doesn't mean it's true so my minimum for the pipe bomb video to be credible to Scott not to you just to me this would be my personal standard I would have to see a video of the allege…
Next segment → →