Back to episode — Episode 3017 CWSA 11/13/25
Context —
r it's called, whatever the f, and she asked Fetterman repeatedly, she tried to get him to say that Trump was a fascist. Like, I need that clip for my show. Call him a fascist. Fetterman would not take the bait. And he said, quote, "I think at this point right now, we are not in an autocracy. We're in a democracy." Well, I'm so sad now. I'm a sad troll. I like to hear that it's an autocracy. Don't…
← Previous segment →e everyman life. Plus he's like the everyman with lots better toys and better cars and stuff. But that's part of his magic that he never leaves that frame. He's just the guy you want to hang out with. He also is super smart and it comes out in little ways that you're not expecting.
Here's the example. So he talked about, and I think I'm going to paraphrase this, but I hope I'm doing it right. And his idea was that in order for Obama and his crowd to sort of divert from the Russia Russia gate hoax, which they were behind, that the fine people hoax was actually the hoax to divert you from the other hoax. And I never really thought about it that way. But that does kind of fit, doesn't it? That the fine people hoax was a hoax to get you off the other hoax. And that their entire structure is hoax to hoax to hoax.
And more importantly, Joe believes that there's no way that Obama was unaware that it was a hoax. Would you agree with that? There's no way that Obama thought that was true. He absolutely knew he was spreading the hoax. Why else would you do it? I mean, you do it to win, but it also is the perfect distraction.
So when you think about the fact that Obama personally was probably behind the Russiagate thing and then personally pushed the fine people hoax to help cover up the other hoax, that is some of the worst I've ever seen in my life. Because that wasn't just about him and Trump, which would be bad enough. That was about us. When I say us, I mean my audience right now and all the people who are potentially Trump supporters. That was about us. He threw us under the bus, right? You can't just say that the guy you support is a Nazi without that automatically painting every single person who supports him.
So we had to live with that. We had to live painted as a bunch of neo-Nazi supporters and we had to wake up in the morning and know that he had just told half the country that we were neo-Nazi supporters. And the more prominent you were as a pro-Trumper, people like me, the more sure the people were that you were a neo-Nazi because of the hoax.
It really is one of the worst things I've ever seen that didn't directly involve violence. I mean, I think it inspired violence. You know, you never know that for sure, but it looks like it did. But am I wrong that if you add the two hoaxes together, they're unambiguously worse than anything I've ever seen in politics? Just anything. Yeah. I mean, I'm not talking about World War II atrocities and stuff. We're not comparing that stuff. But just in the political realm, you know, minus gross overt violence, that's the worst thing I've heard. I suppose. Yeah, I suppose.
All right, let's be fair. Let's be fair about this. It's not worse than slavery. It's not worse than Jim Crow. So let me be a little more common sensical about it. It's not worse than those things. But for ordinary politics, it's worse. It's just worse than anything I've seen. Just unbelievably despicable.
All right, here's another fun story. Eric Swalwell, who happens to be my representative, I believe, does not have a California address. Now, I don't know that that's true. So I would wait for a confirmation that the fact checkers are agreeing with this. But according to the Gateway Pundit, Joel Gilbert, nobody has yet found an address for him in California, but they do have an address, I guess he claims, but at that address, some other family has lived there for years. So it looks like he only has a home in Washington DC or somewhere around there and that he would not actually even be qualified allegedly even to be in office.
How many of you think that's true? This one I think I'd wait on this one because the story is based on we can't find something. What they can't find is a valid address for him in California. But is that a solid argument? We can't find it. I wouldn't automatically believe a story that's based on I can't find it because somebody might find it. But we can wait and see if he claims he has an address. If he claims he has a valid address, we can just check the address. If you want, I can go over and look because apparently he claims he lives in Livermore, which is walking distance in that direction. I can literally walk to Livermore. I wouldn't right now, but I could. So I could go knock on his door. I'm not going to do that, of course.
But anyway, let's talk about the new dust up with the Epstein files. This feels like Groundhog Day, doesn't it? Every time Epstein files comes up.
All right, so the basic idea is everybody knows who Epstein is. You all know that Trump doesn't want the files released, which makes him look guilty of something. Republicans app
Context —
arently are trying to back the president on that and not release them, but Democrats want it all released. And they got enough votes in the House with a few crossovers that would not surprise you. So we got Marjorie Taylor Greene voting for disclosure, I believe. Boebert voting for disclosure. And does anybody feel like arguing with either one of those? If Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene say,…
Next segment → →