n." How would that not work? Hi, my name's Bill. That would work every time. That would work 100 percent of the time. Anyway, so my advice is just go introduce yourself if you're that handsome. It'll all work out.

Robot surgeons. We talked about that. We don't need to talk about robot surgeons anymore.

Dershowitz is fun to check in with every now and then when there's a legal story. And this Epstein thing just never goes away. And Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer at one point in the saga. And Dershowitz points out that one of the reasons, potentially, doesn't know for sure because he doesn't read minds, but one of the reasons that Trump might not want the Epstein files released is how easily they're misinterpreted. And of course, we've all said that, right? That's exactly what I've said. You know, maybe it's because he doesn't want them misinterpreted. But what Dershowitz adds that I was less capable of doing is some examples. If you had some specific examples where you know that a true thing got misinterpreted as a false thing, well, that would be a pretty strong argument for not releasing the files. And apparently there are two examples.

One of them is that the mainstream news and the pundits, they refer to Epstein as a convicted, quote, a convicted pedophile. I'm not even going to use the word. You know what I'm talking about. But Dershowitz points out he's never been convicted of that. There's no conviction on that charge. So was he convicted of something bad? Yes. But was it that? It was not.

Now, I'm not going to make the mistake that some people made to act like one of these crimes is the one that's not as bad as the other one. Because as soon as you do that, all the stupid trolls go, "Oh wow, you're saying that this one's okay? You're excusing these crimes?" No, I'm not. No, no, I'm not. You can have that conversation. I'm not even in the conversation. I refuse to even use the words in the same paragraph. I'm so out of that conversation. And the reason is because I don't want to be misinterpreted. Do you remember when Megyn Kelly said something about the specifics of the charges? And I'm not going to repeat it because I can't even repeat what Megyn Kelly said, which I believe was technically legally accurate because I would get misinterpreted too, just like she did. So you just can't get near the topic without being misinterpreted because everybody's waiting to pounce.

And then there's also the other example of Virginia Giuffre. She's the one who tragically passed away recently and apparently she had said she'd never met Trump and yet the rumors are that she spent hours with him. Now, how do you do a story about a woman who said she never met him and not mention that? Right now, here I think Dershowitz is assuming that the truth is that he never met her because I think Dershowitz makes the same claim that he didn't. I don't know if he said he didn't meet her, but Ders