ake sense for Trump to be trying to work on some kind of a side deal with Saudi Arabia? And then if we get one we like, he just shoves it down Israel's throat. As in, you better take this. No, I know you don't want a two-state solution, but take this. So we'll see. It doesn't seem likely, does it? It seems like Israel, of course, can control its own fate in this particular way. So I don't think we're that close to a two-state solution, but it would be fascinating to see if Trump uses his technique that worked on Gaza. Gaza on Gaza. Didn't he make the deal before he had the deal? So the Gazans had not agreed to it at all and he still made a peace deal. How do you do that? How did he force them into a peace deal when one group didn't want it at all and they somehow agreed that they would, oh yeah, we'll have peace even though this isn't what we agreed to.

Could it be that Trump has invented a whole new way to do peace deals when the situation is impossible? Well, the only way you could get a deal when the situation is impossible is you get people to agree to things that they don't agree to, which is what he did with Gaza. But maybe he could do it with this. Can he get Israel and Saudi Arabia and maybe half a dozen other countries? Can you get them to agree to something that they definitely don't agree to, but then they get a little bit pregnant because they're already celebrating that they made some kind of agreement even though they haven't agreed to it. And even if they said, "No, no, we don't really agree to everything you're saying. We still need to negotiate this two-state thing." And then suddenly the ship is just moving and it's too hard to move it back. If that's what Trump is doing and he's doing it intentionally, he's just inventing a whole new way to solve problems, something we've never seen before. Now, I'd have to see him do it more than once before I'd conclude it's any kind of an intentional thing. But he seems to be tapping on the door of doing it a