Back to episode — Episode 3025 CWSA 11/21/25
Context —
ty for anything really. Governor, senator, you want to run for president? Sure. I don't see why not. It's not like you've done anything wrong, such as lying to the American people about the most important things in the history of the republic. But none of that is disqualifying. I mean, come on. We're a big tent. The Democrats say we're a big, big tent. You can come in if you're even one of the des…
← Previous segment →your hand or you've got any kind of headphone earplug kind of thing, you've kind of already started to merge with the machines. If you've got any kind of meta glasses on, you're another step closer. So we're sort of already committed to the cyborg, half human, half robot world.
But what if, here's the part I'm going to add. What if the only way you could prove the AI part of you is real and it's what you want to happen is if it comes from your cyborg self? What if you were not the human versus the machine, but rather you were human and machine? If you're human and machine, but there's only one of you that is that combination of that machine and that human, it's still just you.
So could it be that to unlock the benefits of AI, where the AI will do all the things that you would have done as a human, you know, spend your money, that sort of thing, could it be that you can only get there when you are unambiguously committed to being a cyborg? Because then the cyborg part of you is no more different from your hands or your feet. It's just part of you. So under those conditions, would you always have access to knowing that your cyborg part was trying to spend some money? Yeah. Suppose the organic part always had to approve any money expenses. That'd be pretty safe. Yeah. I don't know.
So I don't know if we can ever get there, but I feel like you have to go through being cyborgs before you can unlock the real benefit of AI. So that's my prediction. Must be a cyborg to get the full benefit of AI.
And I wouldn't want to be in a military battle, just to further my point, with a bunch of soldiers who were cyborgs if you were not. You know what I mean? So as soon as I say that, you totally understand, which is, oh yeah, I definitely would not want to be in a military battle with cyborgs. They're going to be good.
And what happens when AI gets combined with the CRISPR technology, the gene editing stuff? You clearly that's already being done in some small ways. But what happens when AI can use CRISPR to make anything it wants to make, any kind of living creature, or to solve any disease?
Well, I know what I'm going to do. I'm going to create a monster island. So I'll create a monster island made entirely by AI and CRISPR technology. And I'll just give it some general rules like, all right, make sure at least some of the monsters are cyclopses. Why do you need them to be cyclopses? That's cool. Make some of the monsters have really big tails. Why do they need to have big tails again? How cool would it be if they did? It's all the reason I need.
And then I'd put a bunch of robots on there with high-definition cameras and have the robots film the final battle for Monster Island to see who is left. Which monster will survive?
Is that the most unethical thing you ever heard in your life? No, I'm not really going to create Monster Island. You're a monster. You're a monster if you think that was even real. Who's the monster? Maybe you are. Yeah, makes you think, doesn't it?
Well, here's some good news from Fox News. A new report is saying that apparently our Social Security people are bragging that they've fixed things up way more efficiently than it used to be. How many of you were waiting here today to find out if the Social Security system had become more efficient? I was waiting for it. One of the most exciting things I've ever seen in my life. Yep.
But apparently they've made a whole bunch of improvements since the pandemic. Actually, that's a pretty big deal. So congratulations, Social Security people, for what looks like a big improvement in a small amount of time. They say their in-office wait times are down almost 27%. That's not rea
Context —
lly impressive. Kind of depends where it started from, doesn't it? But they do say it's down to 22 minutes. Remember, I always say that if they give you the percentage without the raw number or vice versa, then that's just propaganda. They have to give you the raw number and the percentage or else they're just sort of lying to you, you know, in a clever way. Here they're giving you the percentage…
Next segment → →